Parole - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: parole Page 1 of about 16 results (0.019 seconds)United States Parole Comm'n Vs. Geraghty
Court: US Supreme Court
United States Parole Comm'n v. Geraghty - 445 U.S. 388 (1980) U.S. Supreme
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOhio Adult Parole Authority Vs. Woodard
Court: US Supreme Court
direct appeal and this Court denied certiorari, petitioner Ohio Adult Parole Authority commenced its clemency investigation in accordance with state law,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTParol Sreeja Vs. Cholayil Karunakaran Nair
Court: Kerala
O.S. NO.257 OF 2004.THIRD ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, KOZHIKODE PETITIONER(S): --------------------- PAROL SREEJA, AGED 4 YEARS D/O.PAROL SAVITHRI AMMA,RESIDING AT SATISH VIHAR
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTParol Abu Packer Vs. Pokkyarath Sivasankara Kurup
Court: Chennai
Reported in: AIR1952Mad161; (1951)2MLJ175
Govinda Menon, J. 1. It is clear that before the appellant was ordered to be arrested, no notice was given...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTParol Mammoo, Timber Merchant Vs. Camp Bazar Palli Sabha and ors.
Court: Kerala
Reported in: AIR2001Ker20
D. Sreedevi, J. 1. This Second Appeal is directed against the decree and judgment in A.S. 5/1998 on the file...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRoberts (Fc) (Appellant) Vs. Parole Board (Respondents)
Court: House of Lords
article 5(4); (a) to withhold material relevant to the appellant's parole review from his legal representatives, and (b) instead, disclose the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTScott Vs. Kentucky Parole Bd.
Court: US Supreme Court
Kentucky Parole Bd., 429 U.S. 60 (1976) Scott v. Kentucky Parole Board No. 74-6438 Argued October 12, 1976 Decided November 2,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR (on the Application of Sturnham) Vs. the Parole Board of England and ...
Court: UK Supreme Court
worded, be read as involving the same substantive test. The Parole Board and the Secretary of State submit that the difference
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOsborn Vs. the Parole Board
Court: UK Supreme Court
prisoners. This includes advising on licence conditions: R (Brooke) v Parole Board [2008] EWCA Civ 29; [2008] 1 WLR 1950, para
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBalakrishnan Nair K.P Vs. Moideen Parol
Court: Kerala
ADVS.SRI.T.KRISHNAN UNNI (SR.) SRI.SAJU.S.A SMT.P.A.SHEEJA SMT.MEENA.A. SRI.K.C.KIRAN RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: -------------------------------------------------------------- MOIDEEN PAROL, AGED54YEARS S/O. KUNHALI, BUSINESS, PALLIALIL HOUSE FEROKE AMSOM, NALLUR DESOM,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>