Parol - Judgment Search Results
Parol Sreeja Vs. Cholayil Karunakaran Nair
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-21-2013
O.S. NO.257 OF 2004.THIRD ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, KOZHIKODE PETITIONER(S): --------------------- PAROL SREEJA, AGED 4 YEARS D/O.PAROL SAVITHRI AMMA,RESIDING AT SATISH VIHAR
Parol Mammoo, Timber Merchant Vs. Camp Bazar Palli Sabha and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Oct-20-2000
Reported in: AIR2001Ker20
D. Sreedevi, J. 1. This Second Appeal is directed against the decree and judgment in A.S. 5/1998 on the file...
Parol Abu Packer Vs. Pokkyarath Sivasankara Kurup
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-1951
Reported in: AIR1952Mad161; (1951)2MLJ175
Govinda Menon, J. 1. It is clear that before the appellant was ordered to be arrested, no notice was given...
Turn these results into brief-ready notes
Ohio Adult Parole Authority Vs. Woodard
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-10-1997
Ohio Adult Parole Authority v. Woodard - 523 U.S. 272 (1997) OCTOBER TERM,
United States Parole Comm'n Vs. Geraghty
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-19-1980
United States Parole Comm'n v. Geraghty - 445 U.S. 388 (1980) U.S. Supreme
Balakrishnan Nair K.P Vs. Moideen Parol
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-26-2013
ADVS.SRI.T.KRISHNAN UNNI (SR.) SRI.SAJU.S.A SMT.P.A.SHEEJA SMT.MEENA.A. SRI.K.C.KIRAN RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: -------------------------------------------------------------- MOIDEEN PAROL, AGED54YEARS S/O. KUNHALI, BUSINESS, PALLIALIL HOUSE FEROKE AMSOM, NALLUR DESOM,
Osborn Vs. the Parole Board
Court: UK Supreme Court
Decided on: Oct-09-2013
appeals raise questions as to the circumstances in which the Parole Board ("the board") is required to hold an oral hearing.
Roberts (Fc) (Appellant) Vs. Parole Board (Respondents)
Court: House of Lords
Decided on: Jul-07-2005
aged 60. The fifth review of his case by the Parole Board, still current, began in September 2001, and this appeal
R (on the Application of Sturnham) Vs. the Parole Board of England and ...
Court: UK Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
of which the prisoner was eligible for review by the Parole Board who could direct his release on licence (Powers of
Scott Vs. Kentucky Parole Bd.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-02-1976
Scott v. Kentucky Parole Bd. - 429 U.S. 60 (1976) U.S. Supreme Court Scott
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Try AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free