Parlour - Judgment Search Results
Raja Video Parlour and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-14-1993
Reported in: AIR1993SC2330; JT1993(4)SC227; 1993(3)SCALE105; (1993)3SCC708; [1993]Supp1SCR149
cassette recorder (VCR) video cassette player (VCP) and a video projector on a separate screen in the video parlours run by them. The appellants have also challenged the validity of the proviso to Sub-rule (3) of Rule
Gandhi Video Parlour Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-07-1997
Reported in: (1998)118PLR287
5 of the Punjab Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for running a video parlour at Loha Mandi Road, Phagwara, District Kapurthala. However, just after two months, the competent authority suspended the licence
Golden Video Parlour Vs. Secretary, Revenue Department and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-11-1991
Reported in: [1992]86STC67(AP)
Rs. 68 per week and show tax at the rate of Rs. 2 per show as the video parlour in respect of which, the licence had been granted was situated in a gram panchayat. As he had
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Smt. M. Ramamani vs Samanta Beauty Parlor
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-14-2026
4TH CROSS, 18TH MAIN, NARAYANA GOWDA LAYOUT, THAVAREKERE, BENGALURU-560 029. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ABISHEK N.N., ADVOCATE)AND: SAMANTA BEAUTY PARLOR PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, Digitally signed SMT. ASHA, by MARKONAHALLI W/O. MR. ASHWATH, RAMU PRIYA Location:
Hameed and Hameed Enterprises Vs. Nicky's Parlour
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-04-1989
Reported in: ILR1989KAR835
Matched in: Parties Hameed and Hameed Enterprises Vs. Nicky's Parlour (04.01.1989 - KARHC)
Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Bhakya Beauty Parlour
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Jun-20-2008
Matched in: Parties Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Bhakya Beauty Parlour
Fariyal Trading as M/s. Miracle, Ladies Hari Dresses and Beauty Parlou ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-21-2017
restraining defendant by itself, its servants, relations, agents or anyone claiming through them from offering services of beauty parlour /beauty saloon using the trade mark MIRACLE or by using any other Trade Mark which is in any
Dasaprakash Restaurant and Ice Cream Parlour Pvt Ltd & Anr vs Mysore D ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-21-2026
to 26* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO(OS)(IPD) 1/2023 DASAPRAKASH RESTAURANT AND ICE CREAM PARLOUR PVT LTD & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Joshy John, Mr. Manav Vohra, Ms. Kavita Nailwal and Ms. Pranjul
Dasaprakash Resturant and Ice Cream Parlour Pvt Ltd & Anr vs Mysore Da ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-21-2026
to 26* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO(OS)(IPD) 1/2023 DASAPRAKASH RESTAURANT AND ICE CREAM PARLOUR PVT LTD & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Joshy John, Mr. Manav Vohra, Ms. Kavita Nailwal and Ms. Pranjul
Dasaprakash Restaurant and Ice Cream Parlour Pvt Ltd & Anr vs Mysore D ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-21-2026
to 26* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO(OS)(IPD) 1/2023 DASAPRAKASH RESTAURANT AND ICE CREAM PARLOUR PVT LTD & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Joshy John, Mr. Manav Vohra, Ms. Kavita Nailwal and Ms. Pranjul
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free