Parlor - Judgment Search Results
Raja Video Parlour and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-14-1993
Reported in: AIR1993SC2330; JT1993(4)SC227; 1993(3)SCALE105; (1993)3SCC708; [1993]Supp1SCR149
S.C. Agrawal, J.1. Leave granted.2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.3. These appeals are directed against the judgment of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana dated August 5, 1992 dismissing the writ petitions filed by...
Gandhi Video Parlour Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-07-1997
Reported in: (1998)118PLR287
5 of the Punjab Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for running a video parlour at Loha Mandi Road, Phagwara, District Kapurthala. However, just after two months, the competent authority suspended the licence
Golden Video Parlour Vs. Secretary, Revenue Department and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-11-1991
Reported in: [1992]86STC67(AP)
Rs. 68 per week and show tax at the rate of Rs. 2 per show as the video parlour in respect of which, the licence had been granted was situated in a gram panchayat. As he had
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Smt. M. Ramamani vs Samanta Beauty Parlor
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-14-2026
4TH CROSS, 18TH MAIN, NARAYANA GOWDA LAYOUT, THAVAREKERE, BENGALURU-560 029. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ABISHEK N.N., ADVOCATE)AND: SAMANTA BEAUTY PARLOR PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, Digitally signed SMT. ASHA, by MARKONAHALLI W/O. MR. ASHWATH, RAMU PRIYA Location:
Hameed and Hameed Enterprises Vs. Nicky's Parlour
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-04-1989
Reported in: ILR1989KAR835
Rajendra Babu, J1. In C.R.P.No. 3911/86 the petitioner/Judgment debtor questions the correctness of the order dated 8-8-1986 and 22-8-1986 in Ex.No. 10046/1986, whereby the executing Court issued warrant for delivery of possession of the suit schedule...
Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Bhakya Beauty Parlour
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Jun-20-2008
1. The short question arising in this case is whether the quanta of penalties imposed on the respondent by the lower appellate authority under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 are liable to...
Fariyal Trading as M/s. Miracle, Ladies Hari Dresses and Beauty Parlou ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-21-2017
restraining defendant by itself, its servants, relations, agents or anyone claiming through them from offering services of beauty parlour /beauty saloon using the trade mark MIRACLE or by using any other Trade Mark which is in any
Dasaprakash Restaurant and Ice Cream Parlour Pvt Ltd & Anr vs Mysore D ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-21-2026
was transferred to this Court by the Supreme Mysore Dasaprakash and Anr v. Dasaprakash Restaurant and Ice Cream Parlor Pvt. Ltd. & Ors Digitally Signed By:AJIT Page 2 of 16Court by order dated 22 August 2017 and
Dasaprakash Resturant and Ice Cream Parlour Pvt Ltd & Anr vs Mysore Da ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-21-2026
was transferred to this Court by the Supreme Mysore Dasaprakash and Anr v. Dasaprakash Restaurant and Ice Cream Parlor Pvt. Ltd. & Ors Digitally Signed By:AJIT Page 2 of 16Court by order dated 22 August 2017 and
Dasaprakash Restaurant and Ice Cream Parlour Pvt Ltd & Anr vs Mysore D ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-21-2026
was transferred to this Court by the Supreme Mysore Dasaprakash and Anr v. Dasaprakash Restaurant and Ice Cream Parlor Pvt. Ltd. & Ors Digitally Signed By:AJIT Page 2 of 16Court by order dated 22 August 2017 and
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free