Parenteral - Judgment Search Results
Parenteral Drugs (India) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-27-2003
Reported in: 2003(157)ELT5(MP)
Matched in: Parties Parenteral Drugs (India) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Parenteral Drugs (India) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-20-1997
Reported in: 1998(101)ELT11(MP)
ICB, Pithampur on 29-6-1996 for clearance of one 'Automatic Aseptic Form Fill Seal Machine for primary packaging of Parenteral Fluids injectable liquids or any other phar-maceuticals or medicinal liquids', falling under Chapter sub-heading No. 8422.30 of the
Parenteral Drugs India Limited and ors. Vs. State of H.P. and anr.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-24-2007
Reported in: 2007(3)ShimLC435
Matched in: Parties Parenteral Drugs India Limited and ors. Vs. State of H.P. and anr.
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Parenteral Drugs (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-05-1990
Reported in: 1991(0)MPLJ386
that the respondent No. 4 did not manufacture I. V. Fluids, but got them manufactured by M/s. Core Parenterals Ltd., Ahmedabad a Pvt. firm and the respondent No. 4 was marketing the products of M/s. Core Parenterals
Parenteral Drugs (i) Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-19-2002
Reported in: (2003)(152)ELT93Tri(Mum.)bai
of aseptic packaging material for packaging of pharmaceuticals with the aid of Aseptic Form Fill Seal Machine/Machines. M/s. Parenteral Drugs (I) Limited were claiming benefit of this notification for imports of polypropylene and polypropylene granules. The benefit
Micropure Parenterals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-05-2005
Reported in: (2005)(190)ELT23Tri(Mum.)bai
1. There was a difference of opinion as regards the classification of medicaments in the form of tablets/injections having fixed dose i.e.combination of Vitamin B1, B6, B12. While the Western Zonal Bench, Mumbai in Emerck India...
Parenteral Drugs (i) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-1995
Reported in: (1996)(81)ELT533TriDel
Matched in: Parties Parenteral Drugs (i) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
M/S. Hindustan Antibiotic Ltd. Vs. M/S. Parenteral Drugs (India) P. Lt ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-22-2000
Reported in: JT2001(1)SC132; 2000(8)SCALE434; [2000]Supp5SCR19
Mr. Ganguli's submission since the judgment itself records the admitted set of facts to the effect that M/s. Parenteral Drugs (India) P. Ltd. being the writ petitioner is regular manufacturer of drugs and the respondent nos. 1
Commnr. of Central Excise and Customs, Indore Vs. Parenteral Drugs (i) ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-31-2009
Fluids having a therapeutic value stood covered under Exemption Notification No. 3/2001.3. In the lead matter - M/s. Parenteral Drugs (I) Ltd. - the respondents were engaged in the manufacture of various types of Intravenous Fluids. They
Jagson Pal Pharmaceuticals Vs. Jagson Pal Parenterals (P) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-14-1997
Reported in: 1997IIAD(Delhi)550; 1997(1)ARBLR434(Delhi); 67(1997)DLT500
does not dispute the fact that the defendant started the business under the name and style of 'Jagson Parenterals Pvt. Ltd in the year 1994. It is also not disputed that the defendant has not got the
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free