Pardoning - Judgment Search Results

Connecticut Bd. of Pardons Vs. Dumschat

Court: US Supreme Court

..... before they complete their minimum terms gave them a constitutionally protected liberty interest in pardon proceedings and that under greenholtz a statement of reasons for denying commutation was ..... proceeded to conclude that t he overwhelming likelihood that connecticut life inmates will be pardoned and released before they complete their minimum terms gives them a constitutionally protected .....

Board of Pardons Vs. Allen

Court: US Supreme Court

..... injunctive relief as well as compensatory damages the complaint charged the state board of pardons board and its chair with violations of the inmates civil rights specifically respondents alleged ..... dissenting relying on semantics and ignoring altogether the sweeping discretion granted to the board of pardons by montana law the court today concludes that respondents had a legitimate expectation of .....

Drexel Vs. Ohio Pardon and Parole Commission

Court: US Supreme Court

..... v ohio pardon and parole commission appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of ..... drexel v ohio pardon and parole commission 373 u s 377 1963 u s supreme court drexel v ohio pardon and parole commission 373 u s 377 1963 373 u s 377 drexel .....

Prudence Realization Corp. Vs. Geist

Court: US Supreme Court

prudence realization corp v geist 316 u s 89 1942 u s supreme court prudence realization corp v geist 316...

Prudence Realization Corp. Vs. Ferris

Court: US Supreme Court

prudence realization corp v ferris 323 u s 650 1945 u s supreme court prudence realization corp v ferris 323...

Prudence Co., Inc. Vs. Fidelity and Deposit Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

prudence co inc v fidelity deposit co 297 u s 198 1936 u s supreme court prudence co inc v...

Chandrakant Chimanlal Shah Vs. Chimanlal Ambalal Shah and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1992)2GLR1411

r k abichandani j 1 the petitioner seeks to challenge the impugned order of the learned city civil judge ahmedabad...

Umesh Kumar Ips Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Dy. Superinten ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

..... is surrendered in favour of receiving evidence from an accomplice against his guilty associates nevertheless pardon should not and cannot be easily available to an accomplice on his mere askance or ..... to have more evidence qualitative or quantitative in nature exercise of the power to tender pardon rests on judicial discretion and the magistrate should proceed with great caution on sufficient grounds .....

Ashok Sehgal Vs. State of H.P and Others

Court: Himachal Pradesh

..... magistrate in the present case is without jurisdiction as magistrate had no power to tender pardon during investigation the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner appears to be attractive ..... said that chief judicial magistrate had no j risdiction to entertain applications for grant of pardon in a case arising out under the act during investigation 23 the chief judicial magistrate .....

Channakeshava B Tingarikar Vs. Central Bureau Of Investigation

Court: Karnataka

..... before the higher authority when it declined to grant pardon even if pardon has been refused on one occasion a further request ..... that the petitioner has submitted an application seeking tender of pardon in support of prosecution but in the instant application ..... direction blatantly contrary to law therefore illegalities galore in granting pardon of accused no 1 the impugned order is thus unsustainable .....