Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.
See full guide → Try it now

Pard - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Aug 29 2001

Pardes Dehydration Co. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-29-2001

1. Appellant is absent but has requested for disposal on merits. I have heard Shri George for the Revenue.2. The appellants were engaged in the dehydration of garlic and onion.Such goods fell under Item 1(B) of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales