Par Value - Judgment Search Results

Haw Par Bros. International Ltd. and ors. Vs. Rangoon Chemical Works a ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

ORDER1. Leave granted in the special leave petition.2. In Civil Appeal No. 2568 of 1998, by order dated 27th March,...

Reza Daru Pars Company & Ors vs.nani Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd & Anr

Court: Delhi

COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 194/2016 REZA DARU PARS COMPANY & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Tripathi

Brahmaputra Par Ii Mach Mahal Samabai Samity Ltd. Vs. State of Assam a ...

Court: Guwahati

P.O. Nimatighat. 3. The matter relates to settlement of Brahmaputra Part -- II Fishery of Sibsagar District (hereinafter referred to as

Seven Hills Par Boiled Rice Mill Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: (2008)11VST184(AP)

aforesaid formula shall be applied separately in respect of each part of the turnover liable to a different rate of tax.Section … the rice millers, aggrieved by the order of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal in Satyanarayana Raw and Boiled Rice Mill v.

Aayush Par Overseas Vs. the Chief Manager, Uco Bank and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: IV(2006)BC193; RLW2006(2)Raj1573; 2006(2)WLC660

Section 13(4), learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that in para 18 of the writ petition the petitioner has specifically mentioned

Par Mohan Das S/O Sri Tarai Das Vs. the Vice-chancellor,

Court: Patna

without any application or request made by him for that particular post. It is obvious that his posting was made as

Kaka Ram Pars Ram and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1996)112PLR691

this land of Mahavir and Mahatma Gandhi. People from different parts of the world come here to learn these fundamental principles … as under:-'Satya (truth) and Ahimsa (non-violence) are the two basic values of life, which have been cherished for centuries in this

Pars Ram Vs. Sh. Shiv Chand and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1968P& H331

such he belongs to Scheduled Castes within the meaning of paragraph 2 read with Part X of the Schedule to the

Dwarikanath Par Vs. Krishna Barai and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1933Cal464

contention of defendant 1 was that he was not a party to nor aware of the proceedings relating to the setting

Ajmera Housing Corporation Vs. M Par Constructions Private Limited

Court: Karnataka

to time will not prejudice the rights of the cither parties.Misc.Cvl.Nos.8102/2010, 9238/2010, 9239/2010 and Misc.Cvl.9240/2010, do not survive for consideration and