Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Pape - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 20 1961

Monroe Vs. Pape

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-20-1961

Monroe v. Pape - 365 U.S. 167 (1961) U.S. Supreme Court Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961) Monroe v. Pape


Feb 24 1971

Time, Inc. Vs. Pape

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-24-1971

Time, Inc. v. Pape - 401 U.S. 279 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court Time, Inc. v. Pape, 401 U.S. 279 (1971) Time, Inc.


Nov 07 2007

Sri Pape Gowda S/o Dase Gowda, Ex-Conductor (KSRTC) Died by LR's. H.P. ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Nov-07-2007

Reported in: ILR2008KAR46; 2008(1)KarLJ646; 2008(2)AIRKarR105; 2008LabIC(NOC)542(Kar)(DB)

case.2. Brief facts necessary for consideration and disposal of this appeal are:The appellant is the son of late Papegowda, who was a conductor in the respondent establishment. The said Papegowda (hereinafter called as 'the Workman) was charged,


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 21 1971

Pape Gowda Vs. State

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jul-21-1971

Reported in: 1972CriLJ120

Matched in: Parties Pape Gowda Vs. State


Oct 16 2025

The Registrar vs Sri Pape Gowda

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Oct-16-2025

560001 VASANTHA …APPELLANTSKUMARY B K Location: (BY SRI. VENKATESH S ARBATTI., ADVOCATE) HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AND:1. SRI PAPE GOWDA S/O CHANNE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/O HOSAHALLI NALA ROAD H 69/2 MANDYA CITY, -2-2. THE


Nov 17 1972

T.V. Sambandam Chetty Vs. St. Francis Xavier's Church represented by I ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-17-1972

Reported in: (1973)2MLJ2

Ramaswami, J.1. The defendant is the appellant. The suit was filed by the respondent Church for ejectment and the appellant herein filed an application under Section 9 of the Madras City Tenants' Protection Act for purchasing...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial