Panjrapole - Judgment Search Results
Ahmedabad Panjrapole Sanstha Vs. Miscellaneous Mazdoor Sabha and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-08-1986
Reported in: 1987Supp(1)SCC50
deciding this question. - [G.L. Oza and; Ranganath Misra, JJ.] -- Labour Law - Minimum wages - Ahmedabad Panjrapole Sanstha, held, covered by Bombay Shops and Establishments Act - Hence liable to pay minimum wages as fixed
The Bombay Panjrapole, Bhuleshwar Vs. the Workmen and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-16-1971
Reported in: AIR1971SC2422; [1972(24)FLR87]; 1971LabIC1401; (1971)IILLJ393SC; (1971)3SCC349; [1972]1SCR202
deed of October 18, 1834 shows that certain Hindus , Parsees and Mahajuns had resolved to start a Panjrapole with suitable.buildings by raising subscription and also by promising to pay certain fees on stated mercantile commodities to
Bhavnagar Panjrapole Thro' Manager Brijesh Himatlal Shah Vs. State of ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-08-2014
between Sihor Panjarapole vs. State of Gujarat 2. Special Criminal Application No. 1948 of 2006 between Jivdaya Mandal Panjrapole vs. State of Gujarat 3. SLP (Cri.) No. 1900 - 2002 of 1990 between Shri Devi Prasad Mishra
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Surat Panjrapole Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-17-1999
Reported in: (2000)GLR21; [1999]238ITR324(Guj)
(Act of 59 of 1960) and the objects of the said Act, the petitioner trust which is a Panjrapole is obliged to perform statutory duties as and when directed by the Courts and the in view of
Panjrapole, Deodar and Etc. Vs. Chakaram Moraj Nat and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Apr-08-1997
Reported in: 1998CriLJ1337; (1997)2GLR1321
Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1960'), the following questions arise for consideration :Q-1 Whether Panjrapole has locus to apply and also approach to the High Courts in the matter of interim custody?Q-2 Whether
Ahmedabad Panjrapole Sanstha Vs. Miscellaneous Mazdoor Sabha and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-24-1986
Reported in: (1986)2GLR231; (1987)IILLJ291Guj
4 of 1985. The Labour Court had occasion to consider to whether the Vastrapur branch of the Ahmedabad Panjrapole Sanstha is a 'commercial establishment' or not and as to whether the employees therein have to be paid
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free