Panic - Judgment Search Results
Bhagwat Dayal Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-25-1991
Reported in: 1992CriLJ214
made poistol of 315 bore was recovered. On account of this heinous kidnapping incident there was a great panic in the surroundings and the public order was disturbed. This incident had been registered as crime No. 124
Ateef Nasir Mulla Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-24-2005
Reported in: AIR2005SC3293; 2005CriLJ3748; 2005(4)KLT74(SC); (2005)7SCC29; 2005(2)LC1225(SC)
of the terrorists are well-organized, well-planned and deftly executed by professionals who have perfected the art of creating panic in public mind. Their activities are pursuant to a deep-rooted conspiracy, and the co- conspirators are more often
K.K. Saravana Babu Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-22-2008
Reported in: 2008(56)BLJR2802; JT2008(9)SC343; 2008(11)SCALE572; (2008)9SCC89; 2008AIRSCW6301; 2008(6)Supreme361; 2008(5)LH(SC)3025
a public road and terminating in the death of a victim is likely to cause horror and even panic and terror in those who are the spectators. But that does not mean that all of such incidents
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Prakash Kumar @ Prakash Bhutto Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-12-2005
Reported in: 2005(1)ALD(Cri)594; 2005CriLJ929; JT2005(11)SC209; (2005)2SCC409; 2005(1)LC446(SC)
planting of explosive devices in trains, buses and public places, the object to terrorise, to create fear and panic in the minds of citizens and to disrupt communal peace and harmony is clearly discernible. This is a
Kamlabai (Smt) Vs. Commissioner of Police, Nagpur and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-30-1993
Reported in: 1994(1)BLJR162; 1993(2)Crimes307(SC); JT1993(3)SC666; 1993(2)SCALE725; (1993)3SCC384
hold of a Sub Inspector and threatening him in a public place like that naturally would have created panic in the locality. We can not say that the ground has no nexus to the public order. The
Surya Prakash Sharma Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-09-1994
Reported in: 1995CriLJ2657; 1994(3)Crimes228(SC); JT1994(5)SC102; 1994(3)SCALE710; 1994Supp(3)SCC195; [1994]Supp2SCR486; 1994(2)LC429(SC)
It is further alleged that due to the gruesome murder committed by the detenu and his colleagues a panic was created amongst the residents of Meerut and the normal life was completely disturbed and people started thinking
Ravindra Shantram Sawant Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-08-2002
Reported in: AIR2002SC2461; 2002(2)ALD(Cri)70; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)102; 2002CriLJ3239; 2002(2)Crimes442(SC); JT2002(Suppl1)SC190; 2002(4)SCALE501; (2002)5SCC604; [2002]3SCR881; 2002(2)LC1056
difficulties, however, arise when the intended activity of the offender results in striking terror or creating fear and panic amongst the people in general or a section thereof. It is in this situation that the Courts have
Subhash Bhandari Vs. District Magistrate, Lucknow and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-03-1987
Reported in: AIR1988SC74; 1988CriLJ190; 1987(3)Crimes686(SC); JT1987(4)SC277; 1987(2)SCALE937; (1987)4SCC685; [1988]1SCR773
society. In other words, this act does not disturb public tranquillity nor does it create any terror or panic in the minds of the people of the locality nor does it affect in any manner the even
Ramveer Jatav Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-29-1986
Reported in: AIR1987SC63; 1987CriLJ321; 1986(3)Crimes654(SC); JT1986(1)SC849; 1986(2)SCALE837; (1986)4SCC762
Laxmi Naryana Gupta with the object of getting the land vacated by him. By this act of yours panic has spread in the area and General Public Order has been disturbed. You were arrested on 27.6.86 and
Mrs. Harpreet Kaur Harvinder Singh Bedi Vs. State of Maharashtra and A ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-21-1992
Reported in: AIR1992SC979; (1992)94BOMLR144; 1992CriLJ769; 1992(1)Crimes589(SC); JT1992(1)SC502; 1992(1)SCALE142; (1992)2SCC177; [1992]1SCR234
reach, effect and potentiality of the act is such that it disturbs public tranquillity by creating terror and panic in the society or a considerable number of the people in a specified locality where the act is
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free