Paneling - Judgment Search Results
Woodon Mdf Panels Private Limited vs Velliyamattom Grama Panchayath
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-04-2022
THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2022 / 13TH PHALGUNA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 18105 OF 2020 PETITIONER: WOODON MDF PANELS PRIVATE LIMITED PPM HAJI TOWER, AM ROAD, NELLIKUZHY P. O., KOTHAMANGALAM, KERALA - 686 691., REPRESENTED BY ITS
Jameela Panels vs Kerala State Electricity Board
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-15-2022
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 24TH KARTHIKA, 1944 PETITIONER: JAMEELA PANELS VALAPATTANAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER T.V. ISMAIL HAJI, MILL ROAD, VALAPATTANAM, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV SRI.P.M.PAREETH RESPONDENTS:
Saffe Panel Industry (P) Ltd., vs State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-03-2021
FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 12TH BHADRA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 23661 OF 2020 PETITIONER: SAFFE PANEL INDUSTRY (P) LTD., INDUSTRIAL GROWTH CENTRE, PALLIPPURAM, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA 688 541, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI. MUJESH
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Aluco Panel Industries vs the State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-03-2020
ALEXANDER THOMAS MONDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 14TH MAGHA, 1941 WP(C).No.2833 OF 2020(D) PETITIONER/S: ALUCO PANEL INDUSTRIES ABDULLAS ARCADE, BUILDING NO.550-D, WARD NO.21, KALAMASSERY, KOCHI-682 022, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MR.SANDEEP SOMADAS. BY
Aluco Panel Industries, vs the State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-30-2020
ALEXANDER THOMAS THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 10TH MAGHA, 1941 WP(C).No.2618 OF 2020(B) PETITIONER/S: ALUCO PANEL INDUSTRIES, ABDULLAS ARCADE BUILDING NO. 550-D, WARD NO. 21, KALAMASSERY, KOCHI 682 022. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
City Panels vs the Commercial Tax Officer,
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-26-2019
NAIDU TUESDAY ,THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1940 WP(C).No. 4644 of 2019 PETITIONER/S: CITY PANELS,MINI INDUSTRIAL ESTATE KOLACHERY KANNUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER B.P.MUHAMED NIYAZ AGED 50, S/O.LATE ABOOBACKER HAJI. BY ADVS.
Jameela Panels and Vincers Vs. K.S.E.B and Others
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-18-2014
K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE18H DAY OF FEBRUARY201429TH MAGHA, 1935 WP(C).No. 14111 of 2008 (E) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------- JAMEELA PANELS AND VINEERS VALAPATTANAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER T.V.ISMAIL HAJI, MILL ROAD, VALAPATTANAM KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.PAREETH
Mysore Panels and Boards Ltd., Vs. the Commissioner of Central
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Nov-09-2001
Reported in: (2002)(79)ECC716
well as penalty was demanded from him in total amounting to Rs. 3,75,480/- from the appellants M/s Mysore Panels and Boards Ltd.,. Similarly as per his Order dated 1.2.2001 he imposed a penalty of Rs. 25,000/- on
Pratik Panels Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2002
Reported in: (2002)(84)ECC490
1. M/s. Pratik Panels Ltd. have filed the present appeal being aggrieved with the Order No. 263/2001, dated 23-8-2001 under which the
Merino Panel Products Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2002
Reported in: (2003)(153)ELT128TriDel
1. The common issue arising for consideration in these appeals is whether an appeal is maintainable under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the provisional assessment. The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) in his orders...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free