Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Paneling - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 04 2022

Woodon Mdf Panels Private Limited vs Velliyamattom Grama Panchayath

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Mar-04-2022

THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2022 / 13TH PHALGUNA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 18105 OF 2020 PETITIONER: WOODON MDF PANELS PRIVATE LIMITED PPM HAJI TOWER, AM ROAD, NELLIKUZHY P. O., KOTHAMANGALAM, KERALA - 686 691., REPRESENTED BY ITS


Nov 15 2022

Jameela Panels vs Kerala State Electricity Board

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Nov-15-2022

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 24TH KARTHIKA, 1944 PETITIONER: JAMEELA PANELS VALAPATTANAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER T.V. ISMAIL HAJI, MILL ROAD, VALAPATTANAM, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV SRI.P.M.PAREETH RESPONDENTS:


Sep 03 2021

Saffe Panel Industry (P) Ltd., vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Sep-03-2021

FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 12TH BHADRA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 23661 OF 2020 PETITIONER: SAFFE PANEL INDUSTRY (P) LTD., INDUSTRIAL GROWTH CENTRE, PALLIPPURAM, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA 688 541, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI. MUJESH


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 03 2020

Aluco Panel Industries vs the State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-03-2020

ALEXANDER THOMAS MONDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 14TH MAGHA, 1941 WP(C).No.2833 OF 2020(D) PETITIONER/S: ALUCO PANEL INDUSTRIES ABDULLAS ARCADE, BUILDING NO.550-D, WARD NO.21, KALAMASSERY, KOCHI-682 022, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MR.SANDEEP SOMADAS. BY


Jan 30 2020

Aluco Panel Industries, vs the State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-30-2020

ALEXANDER THOMAS THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 10TH MAGHA, 1941 WP(C).No.2618 OF 2020(B) PETITIONER/S: ALUCO PANEL INDUSTRIES, ABDULLAS ARCADE BUILDING NO. 550-D, WARD NO. 21, KALAMASSERY, KOCHI 682 022. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE


Feb 26 2019

City Panels vs the Commercial Tax Officer,

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-26-2019

NAIDU TUESDAY ,THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1940 WP(C).No. 4644 of 2019 PETITIONER/S: CITY PANELS,MINI INDUSTRIAL ESTATE KOLACHERY KANNUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER B.P.MUHAMED NIYAZ AGED 50, S/O.LATE ABOOBACKER HAJI. BY ADVS.


Feb 18 2014

Jameela Panels and Vincers Vs. K.S.E.B and Others

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-18-2014

K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE18H DAY OF FEBRUARY201429TH MAGHA, 1935 WP(C).No. 14111 of 2008 (E) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------- JAMEELA PANELS AND VINEERS VALAPATTANAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER T.V.ISMAIL HAJI, MILL ROAD, VALAPATTANAM KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.PAREETH


Nov 09 2001

Mysore Panels and Boards Ltd., Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Nov-09-2001

Reported in: (2002)(79)ECC716

well as penalty was demanded from him in total amounting to Rs. 3,75,480/- from the appellants M/s Mysore Panels and Boards Ltd.,. Similarly as per his Order dated 1.2.2001 he imposed a penalty of Rs. 25,000/- on


Oct 22 2002

Pratik Panels Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Oct-22-2002

Reported in: (2002)(84)ECC490

1. M/s. Pratik Panels Ltd. have filed the present appeal being aggrieved with the Order No. 263/2001, dated 23-8-2001 under which the


Nov 12 2002

Merino Panel Products Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-12-2002

Reported in: (2003)(153)ELT128TriDel

1. The common issue arising for consideration in these appeals is whether an appeal is maintainable under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the provisional assessment. The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) in his orders...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial