Paneled - Judgment Search Results

Jameela Panels and Vincers Vs. K.S.E.B and Others

Court: Kerala

K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE18H DAY OF FEBRUARY201429TH MAGHA, 1935 WP(C).No. 14111 of 2008 (E) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------- JAMEELA PANELS AND VINEERS VALAPATTANAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER T.V.ISMAIL HAJI, MILL ROAD, VALAPATTANAM KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.PAREETH

Mysore Panels and Boards Ltd., Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2002)(79)ECC716

well as penalty was demanded from him in total amounting to Rs. 3,75,480/- from the appellants M/s Mysore Panels and Boards Ltd.,. Similarly as per his Order dated 1.2.2001 he imposed a penalty of Rs. 25,000/- on

Pratik Panels Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2002)(84)ECC490

1. M/s. Pratik Panels Ltd. have filed the present appeal being aggrieved with the Order No. 263/2001, dated 23-8-2001 under which the

Merino Panel Products Ltd. and Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2003)(85)ECC828

1. The common issue arising for consideration in these appeals is whether an appeal is maintainable under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the provisional assessment. The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) in his orders...

Merino Panel Products Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2003)(153)ELT128TriDel

1. The common issue arising for consideration in these appeals is whether an appeal is maintainable under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the provisional assessment. The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) in his orders...

Fathima Panels Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2003)(154)ELT225Tri(Bang.)

1. Issue relates to Modvat credit on capital goods i.e. radiant coil.It was the contention of the party that radiant coil is part and parcel of Thermal Fluid System and in view of the specific entry...

Crp Control Panel (P) Ltd. Vs. Ito

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

1. This appeal is directed against the order of the learned CIT dated 19-6-2003, passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).2. Briefly stated the facts are these...

Konark Wood Panels Limited, Mumbai and Another Vs. the New India Assur ...

Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

logs kept in the yard of M/s.P.V.Ramanmurthy and Sons, on 5/4/1989 18 logs belongs to M/s. Konark Wood Panels Limited and on early hours of 6/4/1989 in the fire 18 logs were partially and fully burnt as

Mysore Panel and Boards (P) Ltd. Vs. Collr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1998)(100)ELT559TriDel

1. The assessees filed a classification list effective from 18-4-1990 describing the goods as "sewing machine furniture" and claiming classification under Heading 8452.00. The Assistant Collector, after reading the process of manufacture and after seeing a...

p.d.r Solutions Fzc vs.dispute Resolution Panel- 2, New Delhi & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decision:24. 09.2019 Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Advocate with Mr. Prashant Meharchandani and Mr. Divyansh Singh, Advocates. DISPUTE RESOLUTION PANEL- 2, NEW DELHI & ANR...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing versus Counsel, Revenue. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.