Panchayat Samiti - Judgment Search Results

Vikas Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti and anr. Vs. Hira Lal

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2000(87)FLR290]; JT2000(10)SC317; (2000)IILLJ1130SC; (2001)9SCC389

Matched in: Parties Vikas Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti and anr. Vs. Hira Lal

Khargram Panchayat Samiti and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1987)1CALLT5(SC); JT1987(2)SC266; 1987(1)SCALE1142; (1987)3SCC82; [1987]2SCR1207; 1987(2)LC406(SC)

and order of the Calcutta High Court dated August 2, 1985 quashing a resolution passed by the Khargram Panchayat Samiti dated April 12, 1985 specifying that the cattle fairs run by two rival organisations i.e. Nagar Cattle Hat … By the judgment under appeal, a Division Bench of the High Court has held that even though the Panchayat Samiti was vested with the power to grant licence for holding of a hat or fair under Section 117

Vikas Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti Vs. Labour Court and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: RLW2008(2)Raj1344

Gopal Krishan Vyas, J.1. In this writ petition, initially the petitioner Vikas Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti, Sadulshahar (Sriganganagar) challenged the award dated 06.06.1994 as well as notification dated 12.09.1994 and it was further prayed … stated in the writ petition, for better implementation of the relief work programme, the State Government directed each Panchayat Samiti to engage Junior Engineers and other staff on daily-wage basis. As per the directions of the State Government,

Jangipara Panchayat Samity and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2005(1)CHN632

and explicit that this Court does not require any further clarification but to quote it hereunder:'117. Power of Panchayat Samiti to grant licence for hat or market.--A Panchayat Samiti may require the owner or the lessee of a … further clarification but to quote it hereunder:'117. Power of Panchayat Samiti to grant licence for hat or market.--A Panchayat Samiti may require the owner or the lessee of a hat or market or an owner or a lessee

Panchayat Samiti Kaithal Vs. Krishan Kumar and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: August 30”1. L.P.A.No.355 of 2012 Panchayat Samiti Kaithal ...Appellant Versus Krishan Kumar & others ...Respondents 2. L.P.A.No.357 of 2012 Panchayat Samiti Kaithal ...Appellant Versus Durga … 30”1. L.P.A.No.355 of 2012 Panchayat Samiti Kaithal ...Appellant Versus Krishan Kumar & others ...Respondents 2. L.P.A.No.357 of 2012 Panchayat Samiti Kaithal ...Appellant Versus Durga Dass & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE

Panchayat Samiti Guruharsahai Vs. Presiding Officer Industrial Tribuna ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.5192 of 2013 Date of Decision:13. 03.2013 Panchayat Samiti, Guruharsahai ....Petitioner Versus Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Bathinda and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present: … reported in the Digest?. RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, J. Aggrieved by the award of the Labour Court, Bathinda, the Panchayat Samiti is before this Court questioning its correctness. The Labour Court on reference under Section 10 (1) (C) of

Panchayat Samiti Bhogpur Vs. Nirmal Singh and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1994)108PLR17

the recovery of Rs. 54065.36 Paise.4.Facts:-Nirmal Singh plaintiff-respondent (herein-after the plaintiff) was appointed as Head Clerk by the Panchayat Samiti, Bhogpur (for short the Samiti) on the recommendation of the Selection Committee vide order dated January 16, 1967. … Court held that it is not the requirement of law that no suit can be filed against the Panchayat Samiti, without serving a prior notice on it. The learned counsel for the Samiti did not challenge die finding

Panchayat Samiti Vs. Pratap Singh

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: [1995(71)FLR740]; (1999)IIILLJ1401Raj; 1995(1)WLC565

March 31, 1992. It has also been stated that there is no post of Tractor Driver in the Panchayat Samiti rather Panchayat Samiti had no tractor, as such the respondent did not at all work for the last … It has also been stated that there is no post of Tractor Driver in the Panchayat Samiti rather Panchayat Samiti had no tractor, as such the respondent did not at all work for the last 12 years. Mr.

Arnod Panchayat Samiti Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1993WLN(UC)216

basis and in pursuance of which these persons applied for the same. A committee consisting of Pradhan of Panchayat Samiti and Vikas Adhikari took interview and ultimately they were given appointment vide order dt. 18.9.1989 for a period … 25.1.90 by the District Establishment Committee, Zila Parishad, Chittorgarh wherein names of 75 persons were mentioned for the Panchayat Samiti Arnod but the names of members of the petitioner. Sangh did not appear in the said merit list.

Sarada Panchayat Samiti Iii Gr. Teachers Association Vs. State of Raja ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1991(2)WLN421

all these writ petitions, the facts given in the case of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2709/1991: Sarada Panchayat Samiti III Grad Teachers Association v. State of Rajasthan and Anr. are taken into consideration.3. This writ petition has … petition for espousing the common cause of all the Primary School Teachers Grade III working in the Sarada Panchayat Samiti District Udaipur.4. It is alleged that all the members of the Association possessed the minimum requisite qualifications except