Panchayat - Judgment Search Results
Gram Sudhar Samiti Vs. Panchayat and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-11-2004
Reported in: 2004(6)BomCR739; 2004(4)MhLj309
villagers of that area. The learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out the provisions of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958, specially Section 4(2) in that behalf. Section 4(2) of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 reads
Gram Panchayat Village Bhainswal Kalan Vs. Gram Panchayat Village Bhai ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-23-2014
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. RSA No.3630 of 2013 (O&M) Date of decision:23. 07.2014 Gram Panchayat Village Bhainswal Kalan -----Appellant(s) v. Jai Pal Singh & others -----Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG1
Bahour Commune Panchayat Vs Bahour Commune Panchayat
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-16-2026
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR and W.M.P.No.4740 of 2020, M.P.Nos.2, 2, 2 & 3 of 2015 W.P.No.25031 of 2015:1. Bahour Commune Panchayat Employees' Union Represented by its Secretary V.Anbarasan 49, Rodiyer Mill Road, Mudaliyarpettai, Pondicherry - 4.2. D.Janarthanan S/o.Devanathan ...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Gram Panchayat Vs. Director Panchayats and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-21-2005
Reported in: (2005)141PLR54
the orders dated 9.11.2004 and 4.2.2005, Annexures P-6 and P-7 respectively, whereby an application, filed by the petitioner-Gram Panchayat, under Section 11 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 (for short herein after referred to
Gram Panchayat Village Hulka Tehsil Dera Bassi District Sas Nagar Vs. ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- Civil Writ Petition No.26196 of 2012 Date of decision:29. 04.2013 Gram Panchayat village Hulka, Tehsil Dera Bassi, District SAS Nagar Mohali .......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondents Coram:
Jayanthipuram Gram Panchayat Rep. by Its Sarpanch and ors. Vs. the Dis ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-29-1994
Reported in: 1994(2)ALT727
ORDERB. Subhashan Reddy, J.1. These writ petitions have been filed by the Sarpanches of various Gram Panchayats. The point canvassed by the learned Counsel for the petitioners is that the employees who were appointed by
Shamsher Singh, Panchayat Secretary Vs. Panchayat Samiti and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-12-1997
Reported in: (1997)116PLR821
4.7.1974.3. As per facts which have come on record, plaintiff was working as a secretary in a Gram Panchayat since the year 1954. His services were transferred to Panchayat Samiti, Jalandhar where he had remained working till
Maliput Grama Panchayat Vs. Kundali Grama Panchayat and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Aug-20-1975
Reported in: AIR1976Ori128
G.K. Misra, C.J.1. Maliput Grama Panchayat is the petitioner. Kundali Grama Panchayat, Pattangi Grama Panchayat and Kotia Grama Panchayat are opposite parties 1 to
Parathodu Panchayat and Etc. Vs. Kanjirappally Panchayat and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-24-1984
Reported in: 1984CriLJ971
ORDERG. Balagangadharan Nair, J.1. The petitioner in the Original petition is the Parathodu Panchayat. There is a canal by name Padapady canal that flows through the Parathodu Panchayat and the adjacent downstream
Village Panchayat, Calangute Vs. the Additional Director of Panchayat- ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-02-2012
G. S. Singhvi, J.1. Leave granted.2. Whether a Village Panchayat established under Section 3 of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 (for short, 'the Act') or any other
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free