Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Paid - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 04 1987

U.P. Income Tax Department Contingent Paid Staff Welfare Association V ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-04-1987

Reported in: AIR1988SC517; JT1987(4)SC585; (1988)ILLJ396SC; 1987(2)SCALE1222; 1987Supp(1)SCC658; [1988]2SCR170; 1988(2)SLJ38(SC)

Article 32 of the Constitution of India.2. The petitioner in this case is the U.P. Income-tax Department Contingent Paid Staff Welfare Association. The members of the said association, as the name of the Association itself suggests, are


Nov 08 2006

Sanyasi Barik Vs. Orissa Secretariat Low Paid Employees Co-operative S ...

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Nov-08-2006

Reported in: 103(2007)CLT103; 2007(I)OLR1

Matched in: Parties Sanyasi Barik Vs. Orissa Secretariat Low Paid Employees Co-operative Societies Limited and ors.


Jan 25 2013

“claim No.1:- Security Amount of ` 5 94 715/- Was to Be Paid Vs. Ori ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-25-2013

on the part of the respondents. The petitioner alleges that the entire amount for this contract was not paid. It is further alleged that the respondents paid Arbitration Case No.119 of 2011 -2- some amount on 15.03.2010


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 03 2013

“20. Mr. JaIn Submitted That the Petitioners Had Paid Rs.5000/- Vs. ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-03-2013

not confer any right of allotment. It was noticed as under:-“20. Mr. Jain submitted that the petitioners had paid Rs.5000/- for the allotment of plots to the Market Committee. It may be so. However, this confers no


Apr 21 2014

“a Sum of `25 000/- Has Been Paid by Petitioner to Vs. State of Punj ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Apr-21-2014

been heard. On 11.9.2013, the following order was passed by this Court: “A sum of `25,000/- has been paid by petitioner to respondent no.2 as per order dated 30.08.2013 of this Court. Respondent no.2 has also come


Sep 10 2004

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sae Head Office Monthly Paid Employees ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-10-2004

Reported in: (2004)192CTR(Del)70; 113(2004)DLT840; 2004(76)DRJ562

Matched in: Parties Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sae Head Office Monthly Paid Employees Welfare Trust


Apr 17 1953

Sri Kalahasteeswaraswami Temple Represented by Its Paid Trustee P. Kum ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-17-1953

Reported in: AIR1954Mad498

Matched in: Parties Sri Kalahasteeswaraswami Temple Represented by Its Paid Trustee P. Kumaraswami Pillai Vs. Madras State Represented by the Collector of Chittoor


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial