Skip to content


Pacification - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: pacification Page 1 of about 580 results (0.021 seconds)
Nov 23 1931 (FN)

Western Pacific California R. Co. Vs. Southern Pacific Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... interstate commerce commission heard the application in january 1929 the southern pacific company appeared in opposition prior to the filing of the ..... junction case 264 u s 258 railroad commission v southern pacific co 264 u s 331 the act sought among other ..... things to avert such losses the texas pacific railway sought to prevent an unauthorized competitor from building an .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 03 1890 (FN)

Texas and Pacific Ry. Co. Vs. Southern Pacific Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... s supreme court texas pacific ry co v southern pacific co 137 u s 48 1890 texas and pacific railway company v southern pacific company no 1210 ..... stated by the court as follows the texas and pacific railway company represented by its receiver filed its petition against the ..... southern pacific company in the civil district court for the parish of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 25 1896 (FN)

Union Pacific Ry. Co. Vs. Chicago, R.i. and P. Ry. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the other by the st paul company against the pacific company the pacific company set up by way of defense that the ..... salina and southwestern railway company the chicago rock island and pacific railway company and the chicago kansas and nebraska railway ..... approved and confirmed resolved that the agreement between the union pacific railway company the omaha and republican valley railway company the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 12 1892 (FN)

United States Vs. Southern Pacific R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... it says substantially that nothing in the grant to the southern pacific shall affect or impair other grants surely the declaration that ..... the title having once vested in the atlantic and pacific that the southern pacific company should stand waiting to take the lands at ..... from the grant of any lands that the atlantic and pacific railroad company might claim under its grant without performing its .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 10 1893 (FN)

United States Vs. Union Pacific Ry. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the bill further alleged the consolidation in january 1880 of the kansas pacific and the denver pacific and the union pacific railroad companies into one corporation under the corporate name of the ..... procure the surrender and cancellation of certain land patents issued to the kansas pacific railway and the denver pacific railway and telegraph company and for a decree declaring all conveyances of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 18 1895 (FN)

United States Vs. Union Pacific Ry. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the several railroad companies herein named are authorized to enter into an arrangement with the pacific telegraph company the overland telegraph company and the california state telegraph company so that ..... company the absolute control of all telegraphic business on the route of the union pacific railway company eastern division the provision that the railway company should transport for the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 02 1941 (FN)

Union Pacific R. Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... tract which were served by the lines of union pacific and missouri pacific the balance of the tract was available for a ..... the kansas city industrial land company and its affiliate the pacific fruit express company to render various services related to the ..... this proposal impracticable they have received considerable payments from union pacific for their efforts in connection with the establishment of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 30 1888 (FN)

California Vs. Central Pacific R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... congress relating thereto and subject to all the conditions thereof if therefore the central pacific railroad company is not a federal corporation its most important franchises including that ..... roads have been constructed in conformity thereto it conclusively appears therefore that the southern pacific railroad company did receive from the united states government and still enjoys important .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 18 1897 (FN)

Southern Pacific R. Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... at the provisions of the several acts of congress relating to the atlantic and pacific and southern pacific railroad companies and which were referred to and construed in the former cases the ..... judgments in those cases have conclusively determined as between the united states and the southern pacific railroad company and its privies the essential facts upon which the government rests its present .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 06 1903 (FN)

Southern Pacific R. Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of february 28 1885 the forfeiture did not vest the southern pacific with the lands forfeited but the forfeiture enured to the ..... of the former company and the contemplated track of the texas pacific met at yuma on the colorado river in the southeastern ..... implication to the grant to the southern pacific in 23 of the texas pacific charter the southern pacific filed the location of its general route .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //