Pachkauri V Queen Empress - Judgment Search Results
Sampath, and Others Vs. State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-21-1992
Reported in: 1993CriLJ2468
by the learned counsel for the appellants in support of this contention are not at all helpful. 26. Pachkauri v. Queen-Empress ILR 24 Cal 686 is a case wherein the accused were charged under sections 147, 149 and
King-emperor Vs. Kaliji Alias Kali Singh and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-31-1969
Reported in: (1902)ILR24All143
circumstances, which were different from those of the present case. The ruling of the Calcutta High Court in Pachkauri v. Queen-Empress (1897) I.L.R. 24 Calc. 686 upon which the Learned Counsel relies, no doubt supports his contention. There
Queen-empress Vs. Timmal and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-31-1969
Reported in: (1899)ILR21All122
conviction under Section 147 was not justified by the evidence, and he referred us to the case of Pachkauri v. Queen-Empress (1897) I.L.R. 24 Cal. 686, and Queen-Empress v. Narsang Patha Bhai (1890) I.L.R. 14 Bom. 441. Neither
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Lal Singh Dhansingh and ors. Vs. the State
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-08-1954
Reported in: AIR1954P& H232
make preparations for resisting an invasion of those rights. The leading case on this point appears to be --'Pachkauri v. Queen-Empress', 24 Cal 686 (A), the facts of which appear to be somewhat similar to those in the
The State Vs. Adra and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Sep-06-1957
Reported in: AIR1958Raj52; 1958CriLJ222
to this field and not enforcing it by show of force. We may in this connection refer to Pachkauri v. Queen-Empress, ILR 24 Cal 686 (C) here the accused, receiving information that the complainant's party were about to
Paras Ram and anr. Vs. Rex.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-20-1948
Reported in: 1949CriLJ445
property would have been completed, and the seed which he had sown would have been ploughed up.21. In Pachkauri v. Queen. Empress 24 Oal. 686 : (10. W. N. 423) the accused on receiving information that the complainant's party were
Paras Ram and anr. Vs. Rex
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-20-1948
Reported in: AIR1949All274
was cutting the sugarcane crop and there a fight took place. His Lordship differed from the case of Pachkauri v. Queen Empress 24 Cal. 686 C.W.N. 423), and distinguished the case of Queen Empress v. Narsang Pathabhai 14 Bom. 441. … property would have been completed, and the seed which he had sown would have been ploughed up.21. In Pachkauri v. Queen-Empress 24 Cal. 686 the accused on receiving information that the. complainant's party were about to take forcible possession
In Re: Mohideen Pichai Rowther and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-01-1938
Reported in: AIR1940Mad43
of theirs, they do not constitute an unlawful assembly. The present case is more or less similar to Pachkauri v. Queen-Empress (1897) 24 Cal. 686 with this difference, namely that in this case Kailasam Chetti and his party
In Re: Veerabadra Pillai and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-03-1927
Reported in: (1927)53MLJ696
land in force in order to resist such an attempt. An example of this class of cases is Pachkauri v. Queen-Empress I.L.R. (1897) C 686, where it was held that, in such circumstances, the accused were justified in
In Re: Veerabhadra Pillai and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-03-1927
Reported in: 105Ind.Cas.657
land in force in order to resist such an attempt. An example of this class of case is Pachkauri v. Queen-Empress 24 C. 686 : 1 C.W.N. 423 : 12 Ind. Dec. 1127 where it was held that
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free