Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

P C - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 28 2025

Seemon P.C vs Rejini P.C

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Mar-28-2025

BASANT BALAJI FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1947 OP(C) NO. 1713 OF 2024 POP NO.23 OF 2023 OF ASSISTANT SESSIONS COURT/I ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, THRISSUR PETITIONER/S: SEEMON P.C AGED 53 YEARS S/O


Sep 07 2011

N.T.P.C. Supervisor

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-07-2011

1. The NTPC Supervisory Employees Federation has filed these two writ petitions aggrieved by the fixation of pay-scale applicable to the W8 to W11 categories of workmen on par with … has filed these two writ petitions aggrieved by the fixation of pay-scale applicable to the W8 to W11 categories of workmen on par with the pay-scales applicable to the Supervisors in the S1 to S4 categories. 2.


Mar 22 2016

P.C. Sebastian Vs. P.C. Chacko and Others

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Mar-22-2016

her son Sebastian (1st defendant)? Did she intend to confer an absolute right on her husband, including the power to make a testamentary disposition over the property included in Ext.B3 Will? If that be so, was the … intentions at the time of executing Ext.B3? Whom did she intend to benefit ultimately? Was it her husband Chacko @ Kunjacko or her son Sebastian (1st defendant)? Did she intend to confer an absolute right on her


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 25 1987

A.E.P.C. Vs. A.E.P.C. Employees' Union (Regd)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-25-1987

Reported in: (1989)ILLJ117Del

1. This is an application under Order 39, rules 1 and 2, of the Code of Civil Procedure moved by the plaintiff against the defendants seeking to restrain the latter by themselves or through their members, … 1. This is an application under Order 39, rules 1 and 2, of the Code of Civil Procedure moved by the plaintiff against the defendants seeking to restrain the latter by themselves or


Feb 11 2003

Chairman and Managing Director, United Commercial Bank and ors. Vs. P. ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-11-2003

Reported in: AIR2003SC1571; [2003(96)FLR1067]; JT2003(2)SC78; (2003)IILLJ181SC; 2003(2)SCALE42; (2003)4SCC364; [2003]1SCR1034; 2003(2)SLJ65(SC); (2003)1UPLBEC840; AIR2003SCW944

Leave granted in S.L.P (C) No. 883 of 2000.Both these appeals relate to judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 7.9.1999 and are, therefore, disposed of by this common judgment. The primary question involved is the scope … judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 7.9.1999 and are, therefore, disposed of by this common judgment. The primary question involved is the scope of interference in the matter of punishment by the High Court.Factual background in


Dec 23 2011

Kayamkulam N.T.P.C. Employees Union Vs. N.T.P.C. Limited and Another

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Dec-23-2011

RamachandranNair, J. Appellant in the Writ Appeal and the petitioner in the Writ Petition are employees unions which have approached this Court for a direction to the employer … in the Writ Appeal and the petitioner in the Writ Petition are employees unions which have approached this Court for a direction to the employer not to deduct tax on the value of perquisites in respect of


Sep 26 1961

K.V. Koshy and anr. Vs. P.C. Chinan

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Sep-26-1961

Reported in: AIR1963Ker176

S. Velu Pillai, J.1. This Second Appeal by defendants 1 and 2 arises out of a suit for a declaration of … suit property and for the recovery of the same with mesne profits. The property belonged originally to one Chacko. He and his brother Eapen purported to convey it on sale with other properties, to their brother Koshy,


Dec 13 2023

P.c.modi Vs. Jawaharlal Nehru Vishwa Vidyalaya .

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-13-2023

MODI .… APPELLANT Versus THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU VISHWA VIDYALAYA AND ANOTHER …. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant being aggrieved by the judgement and order dated 14th December, 2009, … CIVIL APPEAL NO4267of 2011 2023 INSC1067REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.4267 OF2011P.C.


Jan 29 2024

P.c. Jain Vs. R.p. Singh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-29-2024

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). OF2024(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 683-685 of 2023) P.C. JAIN ….APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DR. R.P. SINGH ….RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). OF2024(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 13511-13512 of


Sep 04 2009

P.C. Thomas Vs. P.M. Ismail and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-04-2009

Reported in: AIR2010SC905; JT2009(11)SC548; 2009(12)SCALE235; (2009)10SCC239; 2010(1)LC95(SC):2009AIRSCW5634:2009(5)LHSC3073

D.K. Jain, J.1. This appeal under Section 116A of the Representation of People Act, 1951 (for short `the Act') is directed against the judgment and order dated 31st October, 2006 rendered … short `the Act') is directed against the judgment and order dated 31st October, 2006 rendered by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Election Petition No. 1 of 2004, setting aside the election of the appellant


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial