P - Judgment Search Results

P. Vs. P. and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1983Bom8; 1982(1)BomCR236

1. This appeal arises out of the matrimonial petition filed by the appellant (original petitioner) in the Bombay City Civil Court at Bombay against his wife, the

P B vs.p

Court: Delhi

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + P B P Date of Judgment:26. 02.2019 MAT.APP.(F.C.) 54/2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ankit Mutreja, Mr.Aditya Agarwal and Mr.Zain Ahmed

P. Vs. P. and R.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1982Bom498

1. The appellant (original petitioner) is the husband of the 1st respondent (original respondent) she is alleged to have committed adultery with the

P. Vs. G. Raju, Rajah of Vizianagaram V. Commissioner of Income-tax, A ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1967]66ITR122(AP)

their order in I. T. As. Nos. 550 and 551 of 1960-61.'1. Whether the income from the market properties is assessable in the hands of the assessee under section 10 of the Income-tax Act and2. Whether the

P vs.m

Court: Delhi

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. h January, 2018 CM(M) 107/2018 & CM No.3387/2018 P M Through: Mr. Nalin Tripathi and Mr. A. ........ Petitioner Vashishtha, Advs. versus Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE

R vs.p

Court: Delhi

COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:06. h March, 2018 CM(M) 1395/2017 & CM No.44831/2017 R P Through: Mr. Pragyan Pradip Sharma and Mr. ........ Petitioner Ganesh, Advs. with petitioner in person. versus Through: Mr.

P vs.r

Court: Delhi

$~2-FM * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) 124/2018 P R Date of Decision:19. h July, 2018 Through: Mr. Viraj Datar, Mr. Vineet Jhanjji ........ Petitioner and Mr.

P vs.m K B

Court: Delhi

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgement:18. h February, 2019 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 298/2018 P Through: Mr. Sachin Chopra, Mr. S.S. Bhatia, ..... Appellant Mr. Karan Babuta & Ms. Astha Gupta, Advocates. Versus

P. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1999)2GLR1422

M.S. Parikh, J.1. Rule. Service of Rule waived by the learned A.P.P., as well as learned Advocates appearing for the

P. Vs. K.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1982Bom400; 1982(1)BomCR454

1. The appellant (original petitioner), the husband, and the respondent the original respondent were married an 20th June 1976, The appellant and the