Overcrowd - Judgment Search Results
Shree Damodar Kalvaibhav Education Society Vs. Director of Education, ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-02-2000
Reported in: AIR2000SC2489; 2000(4)ALLMR(SC)574; JT2000(8)SC423; 2000(5)SCALE395; (2000)7SCC194; [2000]Supp2SCR90; (2001)1UPLBEC33
5 Kms. from the existing schools, unless the Director of Education is satisfied that the existing school is overcrowded and there is no scope for further expansion, or there is no easy access to the existing school
Milkmen Colony Vikas Samiti Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-17-2007
Reported in: AIR2007SC1048; 2007(2)AWC2001(SC); JT2007(2)SC509; (2007)4MLJ1064(SC); RLW2007(2)SC1008; 2007(2)SCALE235; (2007)2SCC413
regulations are also legitimised from the point of view of the control of community development, the prevention of overcrowding of land, the furnishing of recreational facilities like parks and playgrounds and the availability of adequate water, sewerage
Milk Producers Association, Orissa and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and or ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-02-2006
Reported in: AIR2006SC3508; 101(2006)CLT715(SC); JT2006(2)SC217; 2006(2)SCALE262; (2006)3SCC229
regulations are also legitimised from the point of view of the control of community development, the prevention of overcrowding of land, the furnishing of recreational facilities like parks and playgrounds and the availability of adequate water, sewerage
18-section briefs on any result in this list
M/S Interglobe Aviation Ltd. Vs. N. Satchidanand
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-04-2011
In the meanwhile on account of cancellation of flights and delaying of several flights, the airport was getting overcrowded and congested. As a consequence, the airport authorities advised the flights which had completed boarding but had not
Som Mittal Vs. Govt. of Karnataka
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-29-2008
Reported in: AIR2008SC1126; 2008CriLJ1610; JT2008(2)SC41; 2008(I)OLR(SC)502; 2008(2)SCALE108; (2008)3SCC753; 2008(1)ShimLC115; 2008AIRSCW1003; 2008(1)AICLR742; 2008(2)LH(SC)942; 2008(2)KCCRSN101; 2008(2)AIRKarR415
load of the High Court and adding to the arrears, apart from the hardship to the public, and overcrowding in jails.45. The right to liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution is a valuable right, and hence
Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Gurnam Kaur
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-12-1988
Reported in: AIR1989SC38; 1989(1)BLJR21a; JT1988(4)SC11; 1988(2)SCALE1155; (1989)1SCC101; [1988]Supp2SCR929; 1988(2)LC713(SC); 1988:INSC:267
of being implemented in a fast growing city like the metropolitan City of Delhi where public streets are overcrowded and the pavement squatters create a hazard to the vehicular traffic and cause obstruction to the pedestrians on
Rama Murthy Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-23-1996
Reported in: AIR1997SC1739; 1997CriLJ1508; 1997(1)SCALE95; (1997)2SCC642
there are nine major problems which afflict the system and which need immediate attention. These are : (1) overcrowding: (2) delay in trial; (3) torture and ill-treatment; (4) neglect of health and hygiene; (5) insubstantial food and
Mahesh Travels and Tours and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Police and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-01-1989
Reported in: AIR1989SC1525; JT1989(2)SC476; 1989(1)SCALE1182; 1989Supp(2)SCC303; [1989]2SCR825; 1989(2)LC188(SC)
time of public worship ; (c) to regulate resort to public bathing, washing and landing places, to prevent overcrowding thereat and in public ferry-boats and, to the best of his ability, to prevent the infraction of any
Usman Gani J. Khatri of Bombay and ors. Vs. Cantonment Board and Other ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-01-1992
Reported in: AIR1994SC233; JT1992(4)SC538; 1992(1)SCALE1068; (1992)3SCC455; [1992]3SCR1; 1992(2)LC441(SC)
modifying the earlier order dated 24.12.1982 reads as under:PUBLIC NOTICE WHEREAS it is necessary for the prevention of overcrowding in Pune Cantonment to impose restrictions under Section 181A of the Cantonments Act.AND WHEREAS public notice inviting objections
The Government of Mysore and ors. Vs. J.V. Bhat and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-14-1974
Reported in: AIR1975SC596; (1975)1SCC110; [1975]2SCR407
used for human habitation-(i) are in any respect unfit for human habitation; or(ii) are, by reason of dilapidation, overcrowding, faulty arrangement or design, narrowness or faulty arrangement of streets, lack of ventilation, light, or sanitation facilities, or
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free