Others V Sub - Judgment Search Results

N. V. Builders Vs. V.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1363 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision:1. 3.2013 N.V.Builders .Petitioner v. Vijay N. Zade and another .Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr.Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner(s).Mr.V.Ramswaroop, … tax was deducted. Learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions from Davinder Kumar, Excise and Taxation Officer, Ludhiana-II, submitted that on account of some mis-interpretation, the amount of interest was calculated from the date of application, however,

V. Vs. George V. Commissioner of Agrl. Income Tax.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (1985)45CTR(Ker)142

27-7-1968. It was an assessee to Agricultural IT on the files of the 2nd respondent - Agrl. ITO, Vythiri. It is alleged that the firm was dissolved by a Deed of Dissolution dt. 2-6-1980 (Ext. P11). After … assessee call for the record of any proceeding under this Act which has been taken by any authority subordinate to him and may make such enquiry or cause such enquiry to be made and subject to the

V. Vs. S. Natarajan V. Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1978]111ITR539(Mad)

not allotted any property ?'The assessee was being assessed as a Hindu undivided family. It consists of one V. V. S. Pandurangan, who is the karta, his wife, Rajeswari, and their two minor daughters, Ponmathi and Leela. … of the Income-tax Act.The learned counsel for the assessee, relying on section 171 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, submitted that there could be a partition even among members as contrasted with coparceners. Section 171(2), which is sought

V. Vs. Rama Rao Naidu V. Commissioner of Income-tax, Hyderabad, and Ot ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1961]42ITR80(AP)

J. - The common question which falls for determination in these writ petitions is whether the Income-tax Officer, Vizianagaram Circle, was right in treating the petitioner as the legal representative of his mother Mahalakshmamma, and in that … 1951-52 and 1952-53. The provision of law under which the petitioner is sought to be made liable is sub-section (1) of section 24B of the Indian Income-tax Act, which provides :'Where a person dies, his executor, administrator,

V. Vs. R. N. Vr. Nagappa Chettiar V. Income-tax Officer, Karaikudi, an ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1958]33ITR226(Mad)

by the petitioner and assessed for the years 1939-40, 1940-41 and 1941-42.The point that is raised is a very short one, and the question is whether the certificates issued under section 46(2) of the Income-tax Act in

V vs State of Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 980/2026 V .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Anushkaa Arora, Adv. (DHCLSC) with Ms. Anchal Yadav, Adv.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through:

V vs State of Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1622/2026, CRL.M.A. 16231/2026 V ...Petitioner Through: Ms. Pallavi Garg (DHCLSC) and Ms. Sanjana Sharma Sahu, Advs.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI ...Respondent Through: … vide the impugnedorder citing Rule 1211(VII) of the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018 (Rules).3. Learned counsel for petitioner primarily submits that it is thefundamental right of the petitioner under the Constitution of India to be represented by a

*** Vs. V.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.7554 of 2013 Date of decision : May 06, 2013 Gurnam Singh Lali, .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab and otheRs......Respondents *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr.Sandeep Arora, Advocate … in the interest of justice, as also in the interest of parties, if the present FIR and all subsequent proceedings, emanating therefrom are quashed. It is a fit case where this Court should exercise jurisdiction, under Section

*** Vs. V.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

1997 (O&M) Date of decision : August 30, 2013 Haryana State Co-op Supply & Marketing Federation Limited, .....Petitioner v. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Hisar & another, .....Respondent *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present

*** Vs. V.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : January 16, 2013 Dr. Kiran Sharma .....Petitioner v. U.T.Chandigarh Administration .....Respondent *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH *** Present : Mr.Vineet Sehgal, Advocate, for the