Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Orthopedic - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 18 1997

instruments Orthopaedics Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-18-1997

Reported in: (1998)(99)ELT60TriDel

limbs and rehabilitation aids for the handicaps was not available for the products manufactured by the appellant, namely, orthopaedic implants like hip joints, screes, (sic) plates, nails etc. used in joints, broken bones during orthopaedic operations. Accordingly,


Jan 31 2003

instruments Orthopaedics Vs. P. Goverdhan Reddy

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on: Jan-31-2003

met with an accident and was admitted in Vijaya Hospital, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad. He was treated by Dr. Ramu, Orthopaedic Surgeon who after X-ray advised an operation for which the complainant purchased nail and plate from opposite party


Jan 02 2017

Dr. Balamugunthan working as a Junior Speciallist in Orthopaedic in Go ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-02-2017

treatment given in the Government Hospital at Karaikal. 3. The appellant/second defendant was working as a Specialist in Orthopedic Division at Government Hospital, Karaikal at the relevant point of time. According to the plaintiff on 26.1.1999 around


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 28 2014

R. Bhaskar Reddy Vs. Dr. Isaac Newton Rajkumar, Orthopaedic Surgeon an ...

Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

Decided on: Mar-28-2014

Forum and contended that the complainant was already treated by some other doctor for which Dr.L.Prakash and another Orthopedic Doctor issued certificate even at the time of admission on 03.08.1998 at the 2nd opposite party hospital and


Jun 13 2011

P. Rajan and Others Vs. Dr. N. Surendran, Orthopaedic Surgeon and Othe ...

Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Decided on: Jun-13-2011

and B2 series. 6.PW1 is the father of the complainant and PW3 is the complainant/injured. PW2 is the Orthopedic Surgeon of Baby Memorial Hospital, Kozhikode. OPW1 is the first opposite party/doctor. OPW2 is the Administrator of the


Oct 20 2012

Dr. S. Prakash Nayar, Orthopaedic Surgeon and Others Vs. Arathi and Ot ...

Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Decided on: Oct-20-2012

The surgeon examined the patient and completely removed the POP on her hand. She was then sent for orthopaedic consultation in the ambulance of the 2nd opposite party to a nearby orthopaedic centre viz, R V Clinic.


Apr 19 2012

Dr. P. Sathish Chandran, Orthopaedic Surgeon, Koyilil Hospital Vs. Moh ...

Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Decided on: Apr-19-2012

that there was no deficiency or negligence on the part of the 1st opposite party who was the orthopaedic surgeon of the 2nd opposite party hospital and who had treated the complainant consequent to an accident on


Dec 27 2011

Dr. B. Udaya Kumar, Associate Professor of Orthopaedics, Andhra Medica ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on: Dec-27-2011

(Typed to dictation of Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.531/2007 on the file of District Forum-II, Visakhapatnam, the opposite party preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are...


Jan 31 2011

Dr.S. Muthaiah, Orthopaedic Surgeon and Others Vs. K. Selvaraj

Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

Decided on: Jan-31-2011

opposite party's hospital, where x-ray was taken at the instance of the first opposite party who is an Orthopaedic Surgeon and the first opposite party informed him that a surgery was needed. Accordingly surgery was fixed for


Nov 16 2009

Dr.B.Lakshman, Dr.Lakshman’s Institute of Orthopaedics Vs. A. Sus ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on: Nov-16-2009

preferred this appeal. The learned counsel for the appellant/opposite party submitted that the opposite party is a qualified orthopedic surgeon having 25 years experience and performed more than 45,000 surgeries and that the complainant was admitted on


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial