Ors V Ram - Judgment Search Results
B.V. Ram Kumar versus State of Telangana and Another
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-10-2025
Reported in: [2025]3S.C.R.48
[2025] 3 S.C.R. 48 : 2025 INSC 194 B.V. Ram Kumar v. State of Telangana and Another (Criminal Appeal No. 654 of 2025) 10 February 2025 [Sanjay Karol and Sandeep
Saradha V. Ram (Deceased) and Others Vs. R. Ramabai and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
dated 18.07.1994.) Common Judgement: 1. The appeal in A.S.No.194 of 2001 was filed by the 2nd plaintiff Saradha V.Ram. She having died pending appeal, 3rd respondent/3rd defendant has been transposed as 2nd appellant in this appeal. The
A.V. Ram Balaji, Proprietor Akshitha Property Developers and Another V ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-10-2017
Mayawanthi Vs. Smt. Kaushalya Devi); 1996 4 SCC 526 (His Holiness Acharya Swami Ganesh Dassji Vs. Shri Sita Ram Thapar); 2014(1) LW 47 (T.S.Sikandar (D) by LRs. Vs. K.Subramani and others); 2015(4) TNL 221 Civil (V.Saraswathi Vs. … (Prayer: Civil Suit filed under Order IV Rule 1 of Original Side Rules 1956 read with Order VII Rule 1 CPC praying for the following judgment and decree against the defendant. a) Directing the defendant to
18-section briefs on any result in this list
V. Ram Mohan Rao Vs. Transmission Corporation of A.P. and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-29-1999
Reported in: 2000(2)ALD161; 2000(1)ALT229
enquiry held for some vital defects in the procedure adopted.'17. A Division Bench of this Court in Y. Rama Rao v. Principal Secretary to Government, : 1999(4)ALD278 (DB), after elaborate consideration of a similar issue framed the … departmental enquiry against the petitioner herein and six other officers and had appointed the Superintending Engineer, Enquiry Cell, Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad as Enquiry Officer by proceedings dated 24-5-1997. The Enquiry Officer so appointed framed the following charges
R.V. Ram Bhupal Prasad Vs. Dodda Ranga Rao and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-11-2000
Reported in: 2000(4)ALD273; 2000(3)ALT610
necessary to know the previous history of the case.3. When the matter came up for hearing keeping in view the position in which the parties were placed this Court had suggested for a compromise. Accordingly, the Counsel … of the appellant upto 31-3-1999. Aggrieved by the same, the appellant preferred the present appeal.8. Sri A.T.M. Ranga Ramanujam, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the appellant attacked the order of the learned single Judge on several grounds.
V. Ram Rao Vs. Commissioner of Labour
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-02-1990
Reported in: [1991(62)FLR125]; ILR1990KAR1848; (1991)ILLJ14Kant
a 3 p.m. when MSRs/M. P. Padmegowda, M. S. Balakrishna, T. S. Uthaiah, A. K. Vishwanath and V. Rama Rao were present. 1. To take 17 workers as suggested by the Union from 9th February 1983 after … contended by the petitioners that there is a dispute as to the contents of the settlement for the violation of which the sanction is accorded for prosecution; therefore, the order of sanction is bad in law; that
V. Ram Reddy Vs. the Chariman, the Sircilla Co-operative Agricultural ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-11-1981
Reported in: AIR1982AP20
It is the case of the petitioner that no enquiry was conducted and his services were terminated in violation of the principles of natural justice. After the said termination, he joined the Sircilla Bank as a temporary … objections - High Court set aside termination order. - MAXIMSSections 2(xv) & 3(1) & (3): [V.V.S. Rao, N.V. Ramana & P.S. Narayana, JJ] Ghee as a Live Stock product Held, [Per V.V.S. Rao & N.V. Ramana, JJ
E.V. Ram and Co. Vs. John Bhatt and Co., Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-25-1927
Reported in: AIR1928Mad873; 108Ind.Cas.644
sizes of the bars, It is impossible to believe that a business firm would have made such a very indefinite offer and, as the words are quite consistent with a reference to the previous correspondence in which
U. Moksha and Others Vs. K.V. Ram Prasanth (was set ex parte in the Tr ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-16-2016
S. Vaidyanathan, J. 1. Challenging the judgment and decree dated 22.08.2013 passed by the Chief Judge, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,
Lakshmi Ammal Vs. V. Ram Chetti
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-02-1998
Reported in: (1998)2MLJ119
Matched in: Parties Lakshmi Ammal Vs. V. Ram Chetti
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free