Ors V N S - Judgment Search Results

Gireesh Kumar.V.N, S/O Narayanan, vs the Authorised Officer, Kerala St ...

Court: Kerala

688561 2 SEETHA,AGED 40 YEARS, W/O GIREESH KUMAR.V.N, BRAHMANIMADOM, KRISHNAPRIYA, KAROOR, AMBALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688561 BY ADVS. V.N.KIRAN LAL ADITHYA NARAYANAN K.G. RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,(NOW KERALA BANK), REGIONAL OFFICE,

Tvl.V.N.S.Construction, Vs The State Tax Officer, (Review),

Court: Chennai

COURT Dated: 03.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P(MD)No.11077 of 2026 Tvl.V.N.S.Construction, Represented by its Proprietor K. Vetrivel, GSTIN 33ACMPV0854B1ZP, No. 34, Williams Road, Cantonment, Trichy - 620001. ... Petitioner Vs. The State Tax Officer, (Review),

TVL.V.N.S. CONSTRUCTION Vs The State Tax Officer (Review)

Court: Chennai

Dated: 03.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P(MD)No.11078 of 2026 Tvl.V.N.S. Construction, Represented by its Proprietor K. Vetrivel, GSTIN 33ACMPV0854B1ZP, No. 34, Williams Road, Cantonment, Trichy -620001. ... Petitioner Vs. The State Tax Officer (Review), O/o

Tvl. V.N.S CONSTRUCTION , Vs The State Tax Officer, (Review,)

Court: Chennai

03.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P(MD)No.11075 of 2026 Tvl.V.N.S CONSTRUCTION , Represented by its Proprietor K. Vetrivel, GSTIN 33ACMPV0854B1ZP, No. 34, Williams Road, Cantonment, Trichy - 620 001. ... Petitioner Vs. The State Tax Officer,

Tvl. V.N.S CONSTRUCTION Vs The State Tax Officer,(Review)

Court: Chennai

Dated: 03.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P(MD)No.11124 of 2026 Tvl.V.N.S CONSTRUCTION, Represented by its Proprietor K. Vetrivel, GSTIN 33ACMPV0854B1ZP, No. 34, Williams Road, Cantonment, Trichy - 620001. ... Petitioner Vs. The State Tax Officer,(Review), O/o

Tvl. V.N.S. CONSTRUCTION Vs The State Tax Officer, (Review)

Court: Chennai

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 04.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P(MD)No.11179 of 2026 Tvl. V.N.S. Construction, Represented by its Proprietor K.Vetrivel, GSTIN 33ACMPV0854B1ZP, No.34, Williams Road, Cantonment, Trichy-620001. ... Petitioner Vs The State

V.N.S.High School Vs. State of Tamilnadu and ors.

Court: Chennai

Tamil Nadu Recognized Private Schools Regulation Act. In the beginning, the School was started with Standards I to V as Elementary School and it was granted recognition by the authorities and for the teachers appointed, staff grant … Ramnad, is a minority Educational Institution started in the year 1924 and it is governed by the Tamil Nadu Recognized Private Schools Regulation Act. In the beginning, the School was started with Standards I to V as … O R D E R1. The petitioner-V.N.S. High School, Ramnad, is a minority Educational Institution started in the year 1924 and

V.N.S. Sockalingam Chettiar (Decd.) by L.R. Vs. Commissioner of Income ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1973]91ITR224(Mad)

question at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras.2. The assessee is a Hindu undivided family, and V. N. S. Sockalingam Chettiar is the karta of the family. It derives income from property, money-lending business at Rangiem in

V.N.S. Chockalingam Chettiar and ors. Vs. the Income-tax Officer, Pudu ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1959Mad509

relied on an observation in the judgment of the learned Chief Justice of Bombay in Commr. of Income-tax v. Jagdisbprasad Ramnath, , which runs thus :"The liability to pay advance tax in this case only arises if … estimate under Section 18-A (3) the only consequence is that mentioned in Sub-section (9) (b) of that seetion, namely, that he would be liable to penalty which may be levied in accordance with the proviso to Sub-section … 1. Two points were urged by Mr. Srinivasan, learned counsel for the appellant in these appeals, against the common judgment

V.N.S. Chockalingam Chettiar and ors. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1959)2MLJ131

relied on an observation in the Judgment of the learned Chief Justice of Bombay in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Jagadishprasad Ramnath : AIR1955Bom255 , which runs thus:The liability to pay advance tax in this case only arises … submit an estimate under Section 18-A(3) the only consequence is that mentioned in Sub-section (9)(b) of that section, namely, that he would be liable to penalty which may be levied in accordance with the proviso to Sub-section … P.V. Rajamannar, C.J.1. Two points were urged by Mr. Srinivasan, learned Counsel for the appellant in these appeals, against the common judgment