Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Ors V K M - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 24 2003

Mrs. J. Zeenath Bivi, Proprietrix N.V.K.M. Traders Rep. by Her Power o ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-24-2003

Reported in: (2004)1MLJ406; 2004(28)PTC590(Mad)

daughters applied to the Trademark Registry for recording the names of sons and daughters as subsequent proprietors by virtue of the deed of partnership dated 1.4.1966 and on 30.7.1966 the sons and the daughters of Mohamed Sultan … their registered copyright, from manufacturing, marketing, selling or advertising or packing in respect of betel nut/supari or any kind or its allied products in the course of business using the trademark ROJA or ROSE or using the … parties have in the artistic work contained in their registered copyright, from manufacturing, marketing, selling or advertising or packing in respect of betel nut/supari or


Aug 16 2013

M/S V.K.M.Kattha Industries P.Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-16-2013

APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1 2 CIVIL APPEAL No.6792 OF 201.3 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.19869 of 2008) M/s V.K.M. Kattha Industries Pvt. Ltd. .... Appellant(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. .... Respondent(s) JUDGMENT P. Sathasivam, CJI.


Dec 15 2006

V.K.M. Pavithran Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Dec-15-2006

Reported in: 2008(1)KLJ756

Court that the principle of sit back is applicable. The decisions relied on are Rabindra Nath Bose and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors. : [1970]2SCR697 and Malcom Lawrence Cecil D'Souza v. Union of India and Ors. … K.M. Joseph, J.1. Questions raised in both the Writ Petitions being connected, they are disposed of by a common


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 23 1965

S.V.K.M. Ratnasamy Nadar and Brothers Vs. K. Subbuswami Iyer and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-23-1965

Reported in: AIR1967Mad180

without substance.(6) learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon the decision of this Court in Paramasive Mudaliar v. Krishnaveni Ammal, 1965 1 MLJ 169, but I do not think that the case in question is of any … as settled out of Court and it was dismissed.(2) Section 69 of the Madras Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955, which provides for refund of half the court-fees on settlement of the case before hearing, runs … This revision has been preferred against the order of the learned District Munsif, Tirunelveli, rejecting the application of the petitioner for refund of half the


Jul 21 1960

V.K.M. Abdulsalam Rowther Vs. State of Kerala and anr.

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jul-21-1960

Reported in: [1961]12STC98(Ker)

Tax Officer, Ponkunnam, has disallowed exemption from tax on the turnover of Rs. 35,666, which is the stock value of pepper, ginger and turmeric, the assessee had on 31st March, 1958. The petitioner's claim for exemption rests … the aforesaid claim being disallowed was filed before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax and Sales Tax, Kottayam ; but the petitioner failed. The further appeal before the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal has also been disallowed. … M.A. Ansari, C.J. 1. The revision petitioner is the dealer, whose gross turnover


Feb 05 1952

R.V.K.M. Surya Rao Bahadur Varu, Rajah of Pithapuram Vs. the Board of ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-05-1952

Reported in: AIR1953Mad472; (1953)IMLJ362

of the Pitapur and other allied estates filed a petition before the Estates Abolition Tribunal for having the value of the said building assessed. That application was referred to the District Collector, Eluru, for enquiry, who forwarded … the affidavit filed in support of the petition is situated in Polavaram B Estate, East Godavari district. In March 1950 the manager of the Pitapur and other allied estates filed a petition before the Estates Abolition Tribunal


Apr 26 1945

Angammal Vs. V.K.M. Muhammad Sulaiman Lebbai and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-26-1945

Reported in: AIR1946Mad38; (1945)2MLJ239

years after the date fixed for payment under Rule 7, Sub-rule (1)., I do hot agree with the view that in the case of a usufructuary mortgage the plaintiff has no right of payment Under Rule 8, … case of a preliminary decree for partition the suit cannot afterwards be dismissed for non-prosecution and must be kept pending. The same result may follow in cases of redemption suits where after a preliminary decree, no action … Somayya, J.1. A preliminary decree for redemption of a usufructuary mortgage was passed on the 15th October, 1935, and the time fixed for


Aug 15 1911

Raja V.K.M. Surya Row Bahadur Vs. the Secretary of State for India in ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-15-1911

Reported in: (1913)ILR36Mad57

by this Court in Second Appeals Nos. 1434 and 1435 of 1904 [vide Sri Raja Chelikani Rama Rau v. Secretary of State for India I.L.R., (1910) Mad., 1 and dismissed, the District Judge's findings being upheld. This … principles on which it is based are discussed by this Court in Secretary of State for India v. Kadiriutti I.L.R., (1890) Mad., 369 and we may also refer to the remarks in Coulson and Forbes' 'Law of … of land situated on the coast of the Godavari district near the mouth of the Coringa river, and included in the Coringa Extension Forest Reserve.


Mar 26 1924

K.V.K.M. Kunhibi Vs. the Secretary of State

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-26-1924

Reported in: AIR1924Mad825

to quit went to the plaintiff. On the 22nd December, 1919 the plaintiff filed the present suit for vindicating her alleged rights of ownership in the Civil Court.2. The Courts below have declared that suit to be … quit under Section 6 of the Land Encroachment Act, III of 1905. Nothing happened for a time. In May 1919, the plaintiff put in a petition for a review of this notice to the Deputy Collector. On


Dec 20 1989

Noorali Babul Thanewala Vs. V.K.M.M. Shetty and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-20-1989

Reported in: (1990)1SCC259a

V. Ramaswami, J.1. In this petition the petitioner has prayed for convicting Respondents 1 and 2 for committing the … Jambli Naka, Thane, consisting of ground floor, first floor and second floor in which the business of restaurant known as Ramrkrishna Hindu Hotel or Ramakrishna Hotel is cursed on, filed Civil Suit No. 213 of 1970 in … 3, 4 and 5 did not file the appeal or take the matter further to the High Court they were impleaded as respondents in the


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial