Ord - Judgment Search Results

Skinner Vs. Orde and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1875)ILR1All230

Servants Rules, 1937 can file appeal under Rules 13, 14 and 15 to authorities provided therein against any order imposing any penalties etc. [Deolali Cantonment Board v Usha Devidas Dongre, 1993 Mah. LJ 74; 1993 Lab IC

Hanamant and Ord vs Sindhutai and Anr

Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO.201862 OF 2019 (MV-D) BETWEEN:1. HANAMANT S/O MAHADEV...

S.E. Orde Vs. Mrs. T.C. Deacon and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1952All582

Malik, C.J. 1. This is a revision against an order passed by the learned first Civil Judge of Meerut rejecting an application for leave to sue in forma

L.W. Orde Vs. the Secretary of State for India in Council

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1918All126(2); (1918)ILR40All367; 44Ind.Cas.923

sum awarded by the Collector, but his objections failed, and he has appealed to this Court against the order of the District Judge. The memorandum of appeal before us raises three points, two of which may be

Ramvresh vs Delhi Cantonment Board and Ord

Court: Delhi

on the decision of this Court in W.P.(C) 2667/2026 titled Danveer Yadav vs. Delhi Cantonment Board, wherein vide order dated 25th February, 2026 in respect of similarfacts the Court had recorded as under:“3. The Petitioner claims to

Gita Enterprises, a Partnership Firm Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Thr ...

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: AIR2007Jhar92; 2007(2)CTLJ415(Jhar); [2007(3)JCR382(Jhr)]

and so it is regulatory in nature.27...The obligation placed upon contractors is not too onerous to be complied.29...In order to check evasion thereof the State must be deemed to be vested with all powers to check that

J.Poornachandra Babu Vs. the Senior Divisional Engineer/Co-ord/Gtl

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

ORAL ORDER : ( As per Hon'ble Mrs.Bharati Ray, Member (J) ) Heard Mr.Ramana Allu, the learned Counsel for the

B. Ram Babu Vs. the Sr.Divisional Engineer (Co-ord), South Central Rai ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

ORAL ORDER {As per Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.Lakshmana Reddy, Vice Chairman } Heard Mr.K.Phani Raju, learned counsel for the applicant

Amar Singh and Others Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary to Govt ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Chandigarh

file a joint Application. 2. The applicants have filed this OA praying for the following reliefs:- “i) Quash order dated 25.8.2011 (Annexure A/1), whereby the claim of the applicants for grant of MACP benefit w.e.f. 19.5.2009 has

Mrs. G.H. Orde Vs. A. Skinner and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1945All331

Allsop, J.1. The appellant, Mrs. G. H. Orde, made an application under the Encumbered Estates Act. She apparently relied on the provisions of Section 49 of