Opposite - Judgment Search Results
Khanna Automobiles, Opposite Aggarsen College and Another Vs. Shri Raj ...
Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on: Apr-23-2013
consumer complaint with the District Forum. The District Forum was pleased to allow the complaint and directed the opposite party/petitioner to replace the vehicle or to refund Rs. 40,765/-, the cost of the vehicle along with interest
Opposition to Urban Tolling Alliance and Others Vs. the South African ...
Court: South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal
Decided on: Oct-09-2013
not so. In fact, the evidence of the respondents, which we are bound to accept, shows the exact opposite. Without the anticipation of toll income, SANRAL could not and would not have borrowed the R20 billion. And
Alexander Perera Chandarasekera Vs. the King, Opposite Party
Court: Privy Council
Decided on: Nov-12-1936
Matched in: Parties Alexander Perera Chandarasekera Vs. the King, Opposite Party
18-section briefs on any result in this list
British Coal Corporation and Others Vs. the King Opposite Party
Court: Privy Council
Decided on: Jun-06-1935
Matched in: Parties British Coal Corporation and Others Vs. the King Opposite Party
Tao, Hsiu-chih Vs. Opposition thereto by Pirelli and C. S.P.A.
Court: Singapore Supreme Court
Decided on: May-12-2014
Grounds of Decision: 1. This opposition matter was decided solely on the basis of the parties' written submissions, without an oral hearing. The matter
Stephen. vs M/S Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd, 1ST Floor Kanaka Dhamodar Bui ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Dec-05-2022
- 695 506. BY ADVS. N.P.ASHA K.K.DHEERENDRAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT: M/S KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD, 1ST FLOOR KANAKA DHAMODAR BUILDING OPPOSITE INTERNATIONAL HOTEL VEEKSHANAM ROAD COCHIN 1ST FLOOR KANAKA DHAMODAR BUILDING OPPOSITE INTERNATIONAL HOTEL VEEKSHANAM ROAD COCHIN, PIN -
Chapala Das Vs. Berhampur University and Another Opposite Parties
Court: Orissa Cuttack
Decided on: Feb-17-2011
is liable to be dismissed.4. Mr. Dhal, learned counsel for the petitioner has assailed the action of the opposite parties on the OJC 13022-1999 Page 3 of 12 following grounds :(a) The action of the opposite parties
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Udham Singh Chowk Opposite Vs. Ram Par ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-16-2012
CHANDIGARH X-Obj. No._______________ in/and FAO No.103 of 1992(O&M) Date of Decision:16. 11.2012 The Oriental Insurance Co.LTD.Udham Singh Chowk, Opposite State Bank of Patiala, Ferozepur..Appellant Versus Ram Parshad son of Shri Bajrangi Parshad Haibowal Kalan Ludhiana and another..Respondents
M/S Navyug Cloth House Opposite Bus Stand Vs. State of Punjab and Othe ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-16-2013
AT CHANDIGARH CM No.13309 of 2013 and CWP NO.9924 of 1992 Date of decision:16.09.2013 M/s Navyug Cloth House Opposite Bus Stand ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK1 To be
M.K. Stalin, Leader of Opposition and Member of Legislative Assembly V ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
fifth respondent status-quo ante in terms of S.O.Ms.No.104, dated 08.08.2016, as Special Personal Assistant to the Leader of Opposition.) 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for the issuance of a Writ of
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free