Opinion - Judgment Search Results

Board Opinion Vs. Hathising Mfg. Co. Ltd.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [2003]43SCL146(Guj)

Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, in accordance with the procedure laid down therein, has recorded an opinion under Section 20(1) of the said Act on 8-3-1999 in Case No. 180/87 that it is just and

Board Opinion Vs. Nanikram Sobhraj Mills Ltd.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [2005]59SCL403(Guj)

this common judgment and order.2. Company Petition No. 2 of 1998 is registered on the strength of the opinion of the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (hereinafter referred to as BIFR for short) received by this

Indian Institute of Public Opinion Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Gopal Krishnan and an ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 126(2006)DLT655; 2006(87)DRJ100; (2006)142PLR52

Swatanter Kumar, J. 1. The plaintiff, Indian Institute of Public Opinion Pvt. Ltd. filed a suit against the defendant, who at one time was employed by the plaintiff. The

Citizens Organisation for Public Opinion Vs. the State of Maharashtra ...

Court: Mumbai

Matched in: Parties Citizens Organisation for Public Opinion Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Indian Instt. of Public Opinion Pvt Ltd. and Others Vs. Life Insurance ...

Court: Delhi

Statutory Order but can only supplement it, to give effect to it. 15. Though we are of the opinion that in the face of the judgments of the Supreme Court (supra) particularly in NusliNeville Wadia, Ramachandran Pillai

“we Are of the Opinion That the Order Annexure P- Vs. State of Harya ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

examined the matter at length the Division Bench had held in the following terms:- “We are of the opinion that the order, Annexure P- 12 has been passed without any application of mind. In this writ petition,

“18. in Our Opinion in a Case Where the Basic Facts Are Disputed Vs. ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

CWP No.15676 of 2012 3 otheRs.1976 AIR (SC) 386, it has been held as under:- “18. In our opinion, in a case where the basic facts are disputed, and complicated questions of law and fact depending on

“8. We Are of the Opinion That the Basis or the Principle If It Can ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

P.C.Sen, a member of the All India Services on deputation to Indian Airlines. The Bench was of the opinion that such action declining benefit of PLI to the applicants is a discriminatory action and, thus, not sustainable

“8. We Are of the Opinion That the Basis or the Principle If It Can ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

P.C.Sen, a member of the All India Services on deputation to Indian Airlines. The Bench was of the opinion that such action declining benefit of PLI to the applicants is a discriminatory action and, thus, not sustainable

as Such Without Expressing Any Opinion on the Merits of the Vs. State ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

by this Court vide order dated 12.5.2014 passed in CRM No.M-5465 of 2014. As such, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and keeping in view the circumstances, noticed herein above as also the