Only - Judgment Search Results
“The Only Point Upon Which the Prosecution Relying Upon Is Vs. Amrik ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
CRM-A No.17-MA of 2013 (O & M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-A No.17-MA of 2013 (O & M) Date of decision :6. 3.2013 Amrik Singh ........Applicant-appellant versus State...
“3. the Only Question in This Case Is Whether a Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
CRM M-31117 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH CRM M-31117 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 10, 2013 Surtaj Singh Sohi … Petitioner Versus State of Punjab … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE...
The Only Argument Raised Against the Notice of Compulsory Retirement V ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Oct-07-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.22154 of 2013 Date of Decision: 07.10.2013 HC Muni Lal ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:-HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present: Mr.R.K.Handa, Advocate...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Only Issue on Which the Respondent No.1 Approached the Vs. Darshan ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-19-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.3151-CAT of 2003 Date of Decision: 19.02.2014 Union Territory, Chandigarh and others ..Petitioners Versus Darshan Lal and another ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE SANJAY...
Ravi Traders Vs. Yours Only, Rep. by Its Proprietor, Navneet Baid
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-14-1996
Reported in: 1996(3)ALT210
ORDERMotilal B. Naik, J.1. In this CRP the power of the Civil Court imposing certain conditions while permitting the defendant in a suit filed under Order 37 Rule 2 of CPC to appear and prosecute the...
Feroz Shabbar HussaIn for Himself and as the Only Son and Legal Repres ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-29-2006
Reported in: AIR2006Bom256; 2006(3)ALLMR668; 2006(3)BomCR613; 2006(4)MhLj387
V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. By this petition, the Petitioner impugns the order dated 4th October, 2005 passed by the Minister for Revenue and Forests as a Revisional Authority under Section 18 of the Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition)...
Notice of Motion to Respondent Nos.1 to 5 Only at Vs. Balwinder Singh ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.2758 of 2013 Date of Decision : February 08, 2013 Balwinder Singh and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM...
“though the Financial Commissioner Has Only Remanded the Vs. Financi ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-31-2013
LPA No.87 of 2013 (O & M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.87 of 2013 (O & M) Date of decision:31.08.2013 Pritam Singh ....Appellant Versus Financial Commissioner, Appeals-I, Punjab,...
The Time of Survey Only Five a Class Buildings Were in Vs. State of Pu ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-20-2013
CWP No.9613 of 2003. ::-1-:: IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No.9613 of 2003. [O&M].Date of Decision:20th August, 2013. Smt. Neelam Vashisht & ORS.Petitioners through Mr.Hitesh Kaplish, Advocate...
Notice of Motion to Respondent Nos.1 to 5 Only at Vs. Hira Singh and A ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.5228 of 2013 Date of Decision : March 13, 2013 Hira Singh and another .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free