One Tenth - Judgment Search Results
Reserved On: 10th January, 2012 Vs. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2012
performance was of the best quality, which was appreciated by one and all. Referring to the notes of Mr. Jarnail Singh, … HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 10th January, 2012 Decided on: 19th January, 2012 + BAIL APPLN.
Tenth Income-tax Officer Vs. B.C. Deshpande
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-04-1988
Reported in: (1988)27ITD194(Mum.)
respect of different sources of income. He received income from one head, namely, salary, but the source of income from salary
Jitendra Pratap Singh and ors. Vs. 10th Additional District Judge, All ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-27-1981
Reported in: AIR1982SC678; (1981)3SCC172
as to whether or not the decree was a collusive one. Normally, a decree passed by a competent court is presumed
Om Prakash Son of Shri Ram Nath Vs. 10th Additional District and Sessi ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-14-2005
Reported in: 2006(2)AWC1556
below have decided the same in favour of the petitioner.3. One of the owners landlords Vishwanath Prasad defendant No. 3 /
Smt. Satyawati Vs. 10th Addl. Dist. Judge and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-16-1993
Reported in: AIR1993All306
ORDER1. Feeling aggrieved by an order passed by the revisional Court exercising jurisdiction under Section 25 of the Provincial Small...
Mrs. Sunita Divecha Vs. Tenth Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-27-1989
Reported in: (1990)32ITD531(Mum.)
proposition that in case the business is different from the one which is done by and on behalf of the assessee,
ilyas Kader Sheikh Vs. Tenth Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-26-1993
Reported in: (1994)49ITD108(Mum.)
taxing provision is ambiguous or capable of more meaning than one, then the court has to adopt that interpretation which favours
S.K. Somaiya Vs. 10th Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-15-1996
Reported in: (1996)58ITD322(Mum.)
from other sources. He has also derived some capital gains.5. One of the common grounds for all these years is regarding
Hansraj Vallabhdas Vs. Tenth Wealth-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-12-1984
Reported in: (1985)13ITD259(Mum.)
1. The assessee-individual holds shares in certain private limited companies, one of which is Jagdish Oil Industries (P.) Ltd. In working
Western India Warehousing Corpn. Vs. Tenth Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-25-1987
Reported in: (1987)22ITD427(Mum.)
premises should be given to the Official Liquidator. Me; while one of the settlors of the trust Muktaben B.Kakkar too: transfer … provisional Liquidator in the said petition by an order dated 10th September, 1975. Final order for winding up was made by
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »