One Sixth - Judgment Search Results
Sixth Income-tax Officer Vs. Kumar Metal Industries
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-26-1990
Reported in: (1991)36ITD261(Mum.)
by the assessee which, according to the assessee itself, was one per cent total consumption of stock of 953.464 tonnes and
Revathi Vs. Sixth Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT
Decided on: Sep-04-1995
Reported in: (1996)57ITD44(Bang.)
case, the question here would have been a much simpler one and the assessee would have certainly been held to be
Sixth Income-tax Officer Vs. R. Sethuraman
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras
Decided on: Aug-19-1981
Reported in: (1983)3ITD148(Mad.)
therefore, it is curious that the revenue should on the one hand treat it as salary as derived from employment and
Sixth Income-tax Officer Vs. K.C. Itty
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras
Decided on: Apr-16-1982
Reported in: (1982)2ITD512(Mad.)
1. The departmental appeal relates to the assessment year 1974-75. The question is whether in a sale of house property...
Sixth Income-tax Officer Vs. Pithva Engineering Works
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-03-1983
Reported in: (1983)6ITD413(Mum.)
mistakes appearing in an assessment order made under Section 143(1). One method is to invoke the provisions of Section 154. Another
Sixth Income-tax Officer Vs. Narendra V. Patel
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-18-1984
Reported in: (1985)11ITR587(Mum.)
to the AAC, therefore, there was no reason to disallow one-fifth of the conveyance allowance. The entire amount of conveyance allowance
Sixth Income-Tax Officer Vs. General'S New Tread
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT
Decided on: May-01-1985
Reported in: (1985)13ITD460(Bang.)
done by strapping on the threads. The process was actually one of repair and not manufacture.3.1 In support, he relied on
Sixth Wealth-tax Officer Vs. B.R. Shelly
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-19-1985
Reported in: (1986)16ITD76(Mum.)
measuring 1,641 sq. yards on a 99 years' lease to one Phirozeshow Cawasji Lentin and his wife. These people constructed the
Sixth Income-tax Officer Vs. Communidade De Mapusa
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune
Decided on: Sep-03-1985
Reported in: (1986)15ITD591(Pune.)
remains that the point involved in these appeals is unique one and will affect large number of similar institutions in Goa.
Sixth Income-tax Officer Vs. I.P. Pereira
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-28-1986
Reported in: (1986)19ITD266(Mum.)
pension commuted was only Rs. 4,199, which was less than one-third of the original pension of Rs. 12,672, the amount received
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »