One Hand - Judgment Search Results
Harding Vs. Hand
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-19-1962
HARDING v. HAND - 369 U.S. 151 (1962) U.S. Supreme Court HARDING v. HAND, 369 U.S. 151 (1962) 369 U.S. 151
Tyler Vs. Hand
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1849
purpose for the benefit of said orphans." The number of orphans entitled to the provision above recited was one hundred and thirty-four, and the lands having been selected, the same were sold in quarter-sections at public sale … Tyler v. Hand - 48 U.S. 573 (1849) U.S. Supreme Court Tyler v. Hand, 48 U.S. 7 How. 573 573 (1849)
Security Warehousing Co. Vs. Hand
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-27-1907
as custodians for intending lenders, directly, instead of indirectly through the security company. In that view, this becomes one of the cases 'in which the exclusive power of the so-called bailee, Union Trust Co. v. Wilson, 198 … Security Warehousing Co. v. Hand - 206 U.S. 415 (1907) U.S. Supreme Court Security Warehousing Co. v. Hand, 206 U.S. 415 (1907) Security
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ramchandra Ganpatrao Hande Alias Handege Vs.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-29-2011
governs the practice to be followed in granting the probate and Letters of Administration. Section 266 on the one hand, confers upon the District Judge like powers and authority in relation to the grant of probate and Letters
Krishna Hande Vs. Padmanabha Hande and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-1913
Reported in: (1913)25MLJ442
We see no reason for departing from the view taken in that case. Mr. Anantakrishna Aiyar states that one of the cases relied on there viz., Ganesh Row v. Tuljaram Row (1908) 19 M.L.J. 4 has been
M/S Hande Wavare and Co. Vs. Ramchandra Vitthal Dongre
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-10-2019
was fixed at Rs.28,77,000/- as per Government ready reckoner and was directed to pay Rs.27,69,500/- as consideration within one month for allotment of said gala by deducting the amount of Rs.1,07,500/- initially deposited by the appellant for … COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5350 2019 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.33627 of 2018) M/S HANDE WAVARE & CO. ...Appellant VERSUS RAMCHANDRA VITTHAL DONGRE & ORS. …Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5351 2019 (Arising out
The Swastik Hand Made Paper Pcis Ltd. & Anr vs.m/s Toyin Woodcraft (In ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2019
the Company situated at 4 Km, Ambala Road, Saharanpur, U.P. which was found locked and was guarded by one M/s Bhagwati Services on behalf of Indian Overseas Bank, New Delhi.7. On 23.02.2011, this Court appointed M/s Contex … IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. 10.2019 + CO.PET. 169/2001 THE SWASTIK HAND MADE PAPER PCIS LTD. & ANR Through: ........ Petitioners versus M/S TOYIN WOODCRAFT (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent
Sarjerao Janardhan Hande and Others Vs. Maharashtra State Co-operative ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-18-2012
in Writ Petition No.950/2008 with Writ Petition No.1514/2008 M/s. Maharashtra State Co-op. Marketing Federation Ltd. vs. Sarjerao Janardhan Hande and anr. , is of no assistance in view of the distinguishing facts and circumstances. That was not
Parvatibai Maruti Hande Vs. Satish Mohanram Prajapati
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-06-2000
Reported in: (2001)4BOMLR516
is the tenant who was inducted in the suit premises in the year 1977 which consisted of only one room admeasuring 7' x 7' situated at Janu Bhendi Pada, Ambernath. The petitioner gave notice on 10th December, … P.W. 1 and P.W. 2 respectively in support that the suit notice was duly served. On the other hand, defendant examined D.W. 1 Mohanram, who is the father of respondent herein. The Trial Court, after considering the
Fibre Hand (Sales) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Chand Rani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-1993
Reported in: AIR1993Delhi201; 50(1993)DLT68; 1993(25)DRJ382; 1993RLR228
to them jointly. (4) The pica is that in face of this admitted position, respondent No. 1, as one of the joint landlords, could not have taken recourse to the special provisions of section 14D as, according … That period is already over. thereforee, grant fresh period of two months to the petitioner from today to hand over vacant possession of the tenancy premises to respondent No. 1. INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES - Welfare legislation should
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free