Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

One Hand - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 19 1962

Harding Vs. Hand

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-19-1962

HARDING v. HAND - 369 U.S. 151 (1962) U.S. Supreme Court HARDING v. HAND, 369 U.S. 151 (1962) 369 U.S. 151


1849

Tyler Vs. Hand

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1849

purpose for the benefit of said orphans." The number of orphans entitled to the provision above recited was one hundred and thirty-four, and the lands having been selected, the same were sold in quarter-sections at public sale … Tyler v. Hand - 48 U.S. 573 (1849) U.S. Supreme Court Tyler v. Hand, 48 U.S. 7 How. 573 573 (1849)


May 27 1907

Security Warehousing Co. Vs. Hand

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-27-1907

as custodians for intending lenders, directly, instead of indirectly through the security company. In that view, this becomes one of the cases 'in which the exclusive power of the so-called bailee, Union Trust Co. v. Wilson, 198 … Security Warehousing Co. v. Hand - 206 U.S. 415 (1907) U.S. Supreme Court Security Warehousing Co. v. Hand, 206 U.S. 415 (1907) Security


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 29 2011

Ramchandra Ganpatrao Hande Alias Handege Vs.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-29-2011

governs the practice to be followed in granting the probate and Letters of Administration. Section 266 on the one hand, confers upon the District Judge like powers and authority in relation to the grant of probate and Letters


Apr 04 1913

Krishna Hande Vs. Padmanabha Hande and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-04-1913

Reported in: (1913)25MLJ442

We see no reason for departing from the view taken in that case. Mr. Anantakrishna Aiyar states that one of the cases relied on there viz., Ganesh Row v. Tuljaram Row (1908) 19 M.L.J. 4 has been


Jul 10 2019

M/S Hande Wavare and Co. Vs. Ramchandra Vitthal Dongre

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jul-10-2019

was fixed at Rs.28,77,000/- as per Government ready reckoner and was directed to pay Rs.27,69,500/- as consideration within one month for allotment of said gala by deducting the amount of Rs.1,07,500/- initially deposited by the appellant for … COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5350 2019 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.33627 of 2018) M/S HANDE WAVARE & CO. ...Appellant VERSUS RAMCHANDRA VITTHAL DONGRE & ORS. …Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5351 2019 (Arising out


Oct 21 2019

The Swastik Hand Made Paper Pcis Ltd. & Anr vs.m/s Toyin Woodcraft (In ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-21-2019

the Company situated at 4 Km, Ambala Road, Saharanpur, U.P. which was found locked and was guarded by one M/s Bhagwati Services on behalf of Indian Overseas Bank, New Delhi.7. On 23.02.2011, this Court appointed M/s Contex … IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. 10.2019 + CO.PET. 169/2001 THE SWASTIK HAND MADE PAPER PCIS LTD. & ANR Through: ........ Petitioners versus M/S TOYIN WOODCRAFT (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent


Jun 18 2012

Sarjerao Janardhan Hande and Others Vs. Maharashtra State Co-operative ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-18-2012

in Writ Petition No.950/2008 with Writ Petition No.1514/2008 M/s. Maharashtra State Co-op. Marketing Federation Ltd. vs. Sarjerao Janardhan Hande and anr. , is of no assistance in view of the distinguishing facts and circumstances. That was not


Jul 06 2000

Parvatibai Maruti Hande Vs. Satish Mohanram Prajapati

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-06-2000

Reported in: (2001)4BOMLR516

is the tenant who was inducted in the suit premises in the year 1977 which consisted of only one room admeasuring 7' x 7' situated at Janu Bhendi Pada, Ambernath. The petitioner gave notice on 10th December, … P.W. 1 and P.W. 2 respectively in support that the suit notice was duly served. On the other hand, defendant examined D.W. 1 Mohanram, who is the father of respondent herein. The Trial Court, after considering the


Feb 08 1993

Fibre Hand (Sales) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Chand Rani

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-08-1993

Reported in: AIR1993Delhi201; 50(1993)DLT68; 1993(25)DRJ382; 1993RLR228

to them jointly. (4) The pica is that in face of this admitted position, respondent No. 1, as one of the joint landlords, could not have taken recourse to the special provisions of section 14D as, according … That period is already over. thereforee, grant fresh period of two months to the petitioner from today to hand over vacant possession of the tenancy premises to respondent No. 1. INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES - Welfare legislation should


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial