On Whose Behalf - Judgment Search Results
Reply on Behalf of the Respondent - State Filed in Court Vs. State of ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-17-2014
Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gurvinder Singh Sidhu, AAG, Haryana. **** Dr.Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, J.(Oral) 1. Reply on behalf of the respondent - State filed in Court today, is taken on record.2. The petitioner, a convict in
State (on Behalf of the Court) Vs. Ajit Singh Jawhar Singh
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jun-14-1971
Reported in: 1971CriLJ1814
Judge also directed to summon Dr. R. L. Mahaian. Medical Officer. Central Jail. Amritsar. on the basis of whose report the respondent had been released.2. After due service on the parties, the matter came up before Dhillon. … B, S. Dhillon whilst dealing with Criminal Miscellaneous No. 502-M of 1971 being a petition for bail on behalf of Jai Gopal and Karnail Singh noticed that the respondent Ajit Singh, who is the main accused in
Court on Behalf of the State Vs. Radha Krishna Khanna and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-09-1960
Reported in: AIR1961P& H113
an execution of a decree against my son, and as per order recorded by the Sub-Judge Panipat in whose Court the proceedings had been going on since many months, the learned District Judge had discussed the case
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Court on Behalf of the State Vs. Shingara Singh
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-20-1962
Reported in: AIR1963P& H185; 1963CriLJ478
Matched in: Parties Court on Behalf of the State Vs. Shingara Singh
Bansilal on Behalf of Shri Ekling Cotton Ginning and Pressing Factory ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-11-1957
Reported in: AIR1957Raj326
before us that it was ever specifically contended on behalf of the assessee that the sons of Bansiial whose names stood mentioned as vendees in the sale-deed executed by shankerlal were minors, and that, for that reason,
Joseph (on Behalf of the Secretary of State for Indai in Council) Vs. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-11-1892
Reported in: (1894)ILR17Mad371
1. This is a Civil Revision Petition put in on behalf of the Secretary of State in Council under Section 622 of the Civil Procedure Code against the decision
Quintavalle (on Behalf of Comment on Reproductive Ethics) (Appellant) ...
Court: House of Lords
Decided on: Apr-28-2005
even more. Zain's mother, Mrs Hashmi, has twice conceived in the hope of giving birth to a child whose umbilical blood could provide stem cells for Zain. Once the foetus was found to have beta thalassaemia major
Hicks on Behalf of Feiock Vs. Feiock
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1986
HICKS ON BEHALF OF FEIOCK v. FEIOCK - 479 U.S. 1305 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court HICKS ON BEHALF OF FEIOCK v.
Hrishikesh Nag Iswar Chandra Nag Vs. State on Behalf of K.M. Ghosh
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Aug-03-1964
The accused Nutan Chandra Ghosh also surrendered in Court on that day. Bail petitions having been moved on behalf of both the accused, the learned Magistrate after hearing the Lawyer for the accused persons as also the
M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. on Behalf of Monitoring C ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-18-2003
Reported in: 2003(4)AWC3334(SC); JT2003(Suppl1)SC391; 2003(7)SCALE636; (2003)8SCC696
Court for the action being taken by the Agra Mission Management Board and other authorities. On 25.3.2003 on behalf of the Monitoring Committee a report was submitted before this Court wherein it was prayed that respondents including
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free