Old Machinery - Judgment Search Results

Kerala Agro Machinery Corporation Ltd. vs the General Secretary, Keral ...

Court: Kerala

JUNE 2023 / 19TH JYAISHTA, 1945 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT ID 19/2009 OF LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM PETITIONER: KERALA AGRO MACHINERY CORPORATION LTD. ATHANI,ERNAKULAM-683585, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI RESPONDENTS: 1 THE GENERAL

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Ruti Machinery Works Ltd.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2000]243ITR442(Mad)

assessee is a company incorporated in Switzerland. It manufactures weaving machines and is said to be 130 years old. It entered into a collaboration agreement with Lakshmi Automatic Loom Works Limited. The collaboration was in respect of … a collaboration agreement with Lakshmi Automatic Loom Works Limited. The collaboration was in respect of all types of machinery described in the agreement. The agreement contemplated manufacture of the machinery in India by the Indian company to

Mining and Allied Machinery Corporation Workers' Union and Ors. Vs. Mi ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2002(6)BomCR204; [2002(95)FLR1127]; (2003)ILLJ660Bom

By this petition, the petitioners, a Trade Union, seek a writ of mandamus directing the Mining and Allied Machinery Corporation Ltd. to pay wages to its workmen at the regional workshop at Nagpur on par with the

Indian Machinery Company Vs. M/S. Ansal Housing and Construction Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.557 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(C) No.19618 of 2013) INDIAN MACHINERY COMPANY APPELLANT(s) VERSUS M/S. ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD. RESPONDENT(s) ORDER Leave granted. We have heard learned counsel

Indian Dairy Machinery Co. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commerci ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(1)SCALE586; (2008)3SCC698; (2008)12VST386(SC); 2008AIRSCW903; 2008(2)AIRKarR277

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted in SLP (C) Nos. 12791-12794 of 2006Challenge in these appeals is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court dismissing the Revision Petition filed under Section 23(1)...

Lagan Jute Machineries Co. Ltd. Vs. Candlewood Holdings Ltd. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2007(6)ALLMR(SC)958; 2007(4)AWC4096(SC); (2007)3CALLT103(SC); (SCSuppl)2008(1)CHN1; JT2007(11)SC461; (2008)1MLJ247(SC); 2007(11)SCALE615; (2007)8SCC487

Sept. 99=Rs. 1,67,568.00Less: Deducted during earlierSaid months =Rs. 1,52,328.00Net amount: Rs. 15,240.00----------------Rs.1,53,181.78----------------With best regards,Yours faithfully,For THE LAGAN JUTE MACHINERY CO. LTD.Sd/- B.B. CHAKRABORTYSUPERVISOR (Cashier)Encl: As above.9. At this juncture, it would be appropriate to take note of

Kerala Agro Machinery Corporation Ltd. Vs. Bijoy Kumar Roy and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC1210; 2002(2)ALLMR(SC)598; 2002(2)AWC1346(SC); 2002(1)BLJR808; (2002)2CALLT42(SC); [2002]110CompCas527(SC); JT2002(2)SC357; (2002)2MLJ83(SC); (2002)2PLR653; 2002(2

of the appellant dated 9.7.1993. It was also said in the letter that the claimant was raising very old claims, which had become about 4 years old. We do not think it necessary to go into further … respondent No.1 in this appeal purchased a Kuboto power tiller on 21.4.1988 from the appellant, namely Kerala Agro Machinery Corporation Limited at its Malda branch, through its dealer, West Bengal Agro Industries Corporation. According to the respondent

British Machinery Supplies Company Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1992(3)SCALE495; 1993Supp(2)SCC76; [1992]Supp3SCR690

8.2.1982.15. As regards the contention that between 16.12.1981 and 8.2.1982, certain parties were supplied the material at the old rate, it is pointed out on behalf of the respondent that till 8.2.1982 they could not charge the

Central Indian Machinery Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1997)9SCC475

Matched in: Parties Central Indian Machinery Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and anr.

Precision Machinery Co., Indore Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Indor ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1997(91)ELT256(SC); JT1997(10)SC735; (1997)9SCC656

recourse to the basic rules of interpretation, namely, ut res magis valeat quam pereat to see that a machinery must be so construed as to effectuate the liability imposed by the charging section and to make the