Offset - Judgment Search Results

United Offset Process Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Asst. Collector of Customs, Bombay ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1989SC622; (1989)1CompLJ53(SC); 1988(18)ECC473; 1988(19)LC571(SC); 1988(38)ELT568(SC); JT1989(4)SC198; 1988(2)SCALE1022; 1989Supp(1)SCC131; [1988]Supp3SCR531; [1989]74S

Matched in: Parties United Offset Process Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Asst. Collector of Customs, Bombay and ors.

Ajanta Offset and Packaging Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs, New Delhi a ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1997(94)ELT443(SC); JT1998(7)SC549; (1998)9SCC125

Matched in: Parties Ajanta Offset and Packaging Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs, New Delhi and ors.

Usha Offset Printers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Bank of Maharashtra and Others

Court: Mumbai

Matched in: Parties Usha Offset Printers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Bank of Maharashtra and Others

Kwality Offset Printers vs Micro and Small Enterprises and Facilitatio ...

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2208/2026 and CM APPL. 10727/2026KWALITY OFFSET PRINTERS.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shrutanjaya Bhardwaj, Ms. Siddhi Nagwekar, Ms. Anushka Singhal, Ms. Yashi Bajpai, Ms. Shubhanshi Phogat, Mr.

Patna Offset Press Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corporation and Ors. ...

Court: Patna

Matched in: Parties Patna Offset Press Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corporation and Ors. (20.08.2004 - PATNAHC)

Janprabha Offset Works Through the Partner Vs. Savra Shramik Sangh Thr ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2007(3)BomCR91; (2007)109BOMLR727; 2007(4)MhLj97

No. 482/1999, thereby allowing the complaint of the respondent union. W.P. No. 854/2003 is filed by the Janprabha Offset works, which is the respondent No. 1 in the original complaint, whereas, W.P. No. 925/2003 is filed by

Ajanta Offset and Packaging Ltd. Vs. the Regional Provident Fund Commi ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 110(2004)DLT757; 2004(74)DRJ293; [2004(101)FLR772]; (2004)IILLJ915Del; 2004(3)SLJ473(Delhi)

Matched in: Parties Ajanta Offset and Packaging Ltd. Vs. the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Dominant Offset Private Ltd. Vs. Adamovske Strojirny

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2000IIAD(Delhi)717; AIR2000Delhi254; 84(2000)DLT594; 2000(54)DRJ523

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. 2. The appellant prayed for injunction restraining the respondents from manufacturing or selling offset printing machines, subject matter of the agreements between the parties, within the territories of India, Bhutan and Nepal,

Niyogi Offset Printing Press Ltd. Vs. Doctor Morepen Limited

Court: Delhi

Reported in: III(2007)BC122; [2009]149CompCas467(Delhi); (2007)2CompLJ548(Del); 2007(95)DRJ33; [2007]76SCL454(Delhi)

winding up of respondent M/s. Doctor Morepen Limited. 2. The petitioner contended that he is a well known offset printing press in New Delhi and did printing work for the respondent during the year 2002-2003. For the

Javed Offset Printers Vs. Presiding Officers and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 131(2006)DLT338; [2006(111)FLR279]; 2007(3)SLJ507(Delhi)

Matched in: Parties Javed Offset Printers Vs. Presiding Officers and anr.