Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: officer or employees Court: delhi Page 1 of about 23,526 results (0.041 seconds)

Mar 04 1986 (HC)

Amarjit Singh Vs. Punjab National Bank and Others

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1987]61CompCas153(Delhi); [1987(54)FLR261]; (1986)IILLJ354Del

..... may at the time of giving the opportunity aforesaid or at any time thereafter, by order direct that, pending the consideration of the representation aforesaid, the chairman or, as the case may be, director or chief executive officer or employee, shall not with effect from the date of such order, - (a) act as such chairman or director or chief executive officer or other officer or employee of the banking company; (b) in any way, whether directly or indirectly, be concerned with, or take part in the management of, the banking company. ..... a contract of agreement, on the expiration of the period for which he was appointed, or earlier in accordance with the terms of his appointment; (c) of an officer employee appointed under a contract or agreement, in accordance with the terms of such contract or agreement; and (d) of an officer employee on abolition of post; (viii) retirement of an officer employee on his attaining the age of superannuation in accordance with the rules and orders governing such superannuation; (ix) termination of employment of a permanent officer employee by giving 3 months' notice or on payment of 3 months' pay and allowances in lieu of notice. 23. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 1983 (HC)

S.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1984CriLJ1261; 1984(2)Crimes5; 26(1984)DLT1; 1984(6)DRJ8; (1984)IILLJ354Del; 1983RLR765; 1984(2)SLJ336(Delhi)

..... a representation on the penalty proposed, but only on the basis of the evidence adduced during such inquiry ; provided that this clause shall not apply (i) where an officer or employee is dismissed or removed or reduced in rank on the ground of conduct which led to his conviction on a criminal charge : or (ii) where the authority empowered to dismiss or remove an officer or employee or to reduce him in rank is satisfied that for some reason, to be recorded by that authority in writing, it is not reasonably practicable to hold such ..... 57(2) which says : 'a disciplinary authority competent under these regulations to impose any of the penalties,specified in clauses (i) to (iv) of regulation 54 may institute disciplinary proceedings against any employee of the corporation for the imposition of any of the penalties specified in clauses (v) to (ix) of regulation 54 notwithstanding that such disciplinary authority is not competent under these regulations to impose any ..... if there is an order of compulsory retirement under the regulation but in essence the object is to punish the employee, the courts have the power to go behind the order and see what is its effect. ..... that sub-section says:- '(5) no officer or other employee transferred by an order made under sub-section (1):- (a) shall be dismissed or removed by an authority subordinate to that competent to make a similar or equivalent appointment under the corporation as may be specified in the regulations made by the corporation under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 2007 (HC)

Shri Muralidharan K. Vs. the Management of Circle Freight Intl. (India ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2007(96)DRJ14; (2007)IIILLJ953Del

..... . the court considered the appointment letter of the employee and noticed that though appointed as a 'development officer' the employee had no authority to bind the corporation in any way and that his principal duty appeared to be to organise and develop the business of the corporation in the area allotted to him and for ..... urged herein that 'the company cannot employ employees who have control in the office of both financial and administrative management and ..... sub ordinate staff working under the development officer and consequently it was held that the employee was not engaged in administrative or ..... is noteworthy that both the circulars dated 27th june, 1989 were in the nature of a general circular to all employees and did not level any specific charges against any person nor was it in the nature of a charge sheet ..... the petitioner in the case, the court was of the view that because the employee was the senior most clerk doing the work of maintaining and writing cash books and preparing various returns, he was given a small amount of control over the other clerks working in his section which were minor duties of the supervisory nature, would not convert his office of senior clerk into that of a supervisor.30 ..... . it is well settled that neither the appellation to the post to which an employee is stated to be employed nor the salary which he is being paid would decide the issue as to whether a person is covered within the definition of 'workman' as given in section 2(s) of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 08 1994 (HC)

Trishul Construction Co. Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1994(2)ARBLR303(Delhi); 1994(31)DRJ37

..... he must be attributed with the knowledge that having conferred the authority to nominate an arbitrator on the engineer member of the dda, the authority could very well nominate an employee of the dda as an arbitrator and the officer or employee nominated as an arbitrator would not be disqualified from acting as such merely on account of his helving been associated with the contract work or even on account of his helving expressed his view on ..... it was held that a railway officer acting as an arbitrator in a matter to which railway was a party, could not be said to have unduly favored the railway department simply because of his being a railway employee in the absence of anything to show that the officers were favorably inclined towards the department ..... disqualified from acting as an arbitrator and deserves to be removed because of his being an employee of the dda and/or having been associated to some extent with the execution of the ..... the engineer member to appoint the arbitrator goes on to state inter alias :- 'it will be no objection to any appointment that the arbitrator so appointed is the dda employee, that he had to deal with the matters to which the contract relates and that in the course of his duties, as dda authority employee he had expressed views on all or any of the matters in dispute or difference. ..... steel authority of india ltd, : air1989ori251 has held that merely because an officer of the corporate body, one party to the arbitration, was acting as an arbitrator, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 24 2002 (HC)

In Re: Electronics Ltd. (In Liqn)

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2002(64)DRJ402

..... thereafter section 468 further specifies that the court may, at any time after making a winding up order, inter alias require any officer or other employee of the company to deliver, surrender or transfer forthwith or within such time as the court may directs to the official liquidator, any other property in his custody or under his control which the company is ..... it provides that if any officer or employee of a company being possessed of company's property wrongfully withholds it from the general use and benefit of the company, he would ..... this is not only because the industrial disputes act is a beneficial legislation but also because in respect of relationship between employees and employer, it is the legislation which is more special legislation; whereas in this respect, the companies act is ..... 503 , the issue was whether the official liquidator was liable for making contributions under the employees' provident fund act during the period for which the establishment was in the process of ..... it was argued in the court below that all the employees were entitled to take advantage of the tripartite agreement, firstly, on the ground that it became part of their contract of service and secondly, on the ground that the discharge of employees under section 445(3) of the companies act is equivalent to retrenchment as ..... this application has been filed on behalf of fifty-two persons who are ex-workmen/ex-officers of the company praying that they be imp leaded as party to the liquidation proceedings .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 10 1986 (HC)

Sultan Singh Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1987(12)DRJ116; [1987(54)FLR116]

..... hajelay & another (supra) as well wherein it has been held : 'that the proviso to section 95(1) gives protection to every officer and employee of the undertaking that he may not be removed or dismissed from service by an authority subordinate to that by which he was appointed. ..... the presiding 'officer of the industrial tribunal) decided on 9th july 1979 wherein it has 118 been held that even if the passenger witnesses are not examined and if there was enough other evidence to prove the misconduct of the employee the inquiry is not vitiated. ..... in the present case also, there is a clear finding that the checking officers were examined and they gave evidence to prove the misconduct and the statement of the passenger was recorded in the presence of the petitioner. ..... (9) no doubt the power to remove cannot be delegated to an inferior officer but then in the present case from the letter of appointment it appears that the appointment itself was made the assistant general manager. ..... the presiding officer) decided on 10th february 1979 and l.p.a. 38/78 (d.t.c. v. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 28 2019 (HC)

North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs.rajesh Sharma

Court : Delhi

..... than three hundred and fifty rupees, shall vest in the general manager (electricity), the general manager (transport), or the commissioner, as the case may be: provided that the power of appointing officers and other employees immediately subordinate to the municipal secretary or the municipal chief auditor, whose minimum monthly salary (exclusive of allowances) is less than three hundred and fifty rupees, shall vest in the standing committee: ..... fifty rupees or more shall vest (i) in the delhi electric supply committee, the delhi transport committee and the delhi water supply and sewage disposal committee respectively in the case of officers and other employees appointed in connection with the affairs of the delhi electric supply undertaking, the delhi transport undertaking and the delhi water supply and sewage disposal undertaking, in the corporation in the case ..... regulation that may be made in this behalf contained in clause (d) of section 59 of the act refer to regulations that may be made in future on the aspect who is the disciplinary authority in relation to municipal officers and other municipal employees, after the re-enactment of clause (d) of section 59 of the act vide the act no.67 of 1993, and the pre-existing regulations of 1959, in so far as, they are inconsistent with the power vested in ..... iii) commissioner (i), (ii) & (iii) deputy commissioner deputy commissioner municipal any officer or employees to whom powers impose penalty is delegated under section 491 of the act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 07 1969 (HC)

Suresh Chandra Sharma Vs. Delhi Library Board

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1970Delhi333

..... , in the third class of cases, the officer or employee cannto lawfully be dismissed without being given an ..... some of which had already been filed with the case by the prosecution and the petitioner had denied having had any hand in their issue, that the inquiry officer had given two further opportunities to inspect the original documents which were produced by public witness 12, but the petitioner deliberately avoided doing so, and that on august 25, 1967, thereforee, when ..... the inquiry officer ordered the prosecution to proceed with the further examination of public witness 12, the petitioner walked out to escape from an awkward position because the documents to be produced on that date by public ..... shri makwana submitted that the petitioner, as an employee of the library board, is in a position comparable with that of a gazetted officer, that the library board is an autonomous organisation such as is referred to in the aforesaid letter of the ministry of education, dated december 22, 1966, and that, thereforee, the ..... only office orders issued from time to time referring to the applicability of the conduct rules to the employees of ..... of department, administrative officer or any employee of the board. ..... an employee of delhi electric supply undertaking, but the inquiry officer wrongly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 1971 (HC)

The Management of Delhi Transport Undertaking Vs. B.B.L. Hajeley and o ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1971Delhi568

..... provides that every municipal officer or other municipal employee shall be liable to be removed or dismissed by such authority as may be prescribed by the regulations provided that no such officer or employee shall be ...... ..... (8) section 95(1) and section 491 of the corporation act on which much of the arguments were based may at this stage be reproduced and are as :- '95(1): every municipal officer or other municipal employee shall be liable to have his increments or promotion with-held or to be censured, .reduced in rank, compulsorily retired, removed or dismissed for any breach of any departmental regulations or of discipline or for carelessness, unfitness, neglect of duty or other ..... of work does not permit him to make appointment himself it is open to him by virtue of section 491 corporation act to delegate power of appointment to any officer, which he may himself specify- once an officer who has been delegated the power of appointment makes any appointment the power of removal necessarily would be available to him and the objection that an employee was being removed by an authority subordinate to that by which he was appointed would not arise. ..... now section 511 of the corporation act provides that every officer and other employee of each of the bodies and local authorities specified in the second schedule shall, on the establishment of the corporation be transferred to and become an officer or other employee of the corporation with such designation as the commissioner may .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2013 (HC)

Dr.Jairaj Singh Sagar Vs. Mcd Thru??? Commissioner

Court : Delhi

..... retirement; and (d) termination of the services :of a municipal officer or other municipal employee appointed on probation, during or at the end of the period of probation, in accordance with the terms of his appointment or the rules and orders governing probation; or of a temporary municipal officer or other municipal employee in accordance with rule 5 of the central civil services (temporary services) rules, 1949, as applied to such officers or employees; or of a municipal officer or other municipal employee employed under an agreement, in accordance with the terms ..... appointing authority and disciplinary authority respectively as under:(b) appointing authority in relation to a municipal officer or other municipal employee means the authority empowered by or under the act to make appointments to the post which such officer or employee for the time being holds; (c) disciplinary authority in relation to the imposition of a penalty on a municipal officer or other municipal employee means the authority competent under these regulations to impose on him that penalty; 23. ..... 60 or in section 89 or section 92, the first appointment to the post of the general manager (electricity) or the general manager (transport) or the first appointment to the post of any municipal officer or other municipal employee may be made by the central government so however that the term of any such appointment shall not in any case exceed three years: provided that the power under this sub-section shall not .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //