Office - Judgment Search Results

Bfc Officers' Welfare Trust No. Vi Vs. Income-Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1997)63ITD169(Mum.)

further seen that the beneficiaries under the trust are the officers of certain category of the company. The objects of the

District Excise Officer, Vs. Income Tax Officer (ito V. Distt.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1998)66ITD168(Delhi)

the face of demand created on District Excise & Taxation Officer could it be said no liability has been fastened on

District Excise Officer Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1998)61TTJ(Delhi)770

of convenience.The facts in brief are that the Income Tax Officer (TDS) Dehradun passed an order under section 206C of the

Chief Electoral Officer, Haryana Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh

Reported in: (1999)68ITD439(Chd.)

the communication dt. 24th May, 1994, from the Chief Electoral Officer, Haryana, to the managing director, HARTRON. Specific attention of the

District Excise Officer, Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

February, 1997 in detail was served upon the District Excise Officer where short-collection of tax on purchase price of abovenoted items

District Excise Officer Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

(Appeals) erred in confirming even those orders of the Income-tax Officer (TDS), Muzaffarnagar, for the financial years 1991-92,1992-93,1994-95 and 1995-96 which

Principal Officer, Somani Iron Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow

Reported in: (2003)86ITD750Luck

have been filed by the same assessee, namely, the Principal Officer, M/s Somani Iron & Steels Ltd., Kanpur, against a combined

Senior Accounts Officer (O and M), Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (2006)103TTJ(Delhi)584

price for erection and commissioning of opening of the site office. (iii) 75 per cent of the contract price for erection

Finance Officer, Maharishi Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (2008)113TTJ(Delhi)914

harassment to the assessee caused by the failure of these officers to give effect to the orders of the authorities higher

Project Officer, Sounda D. Colliery of Central Coal Fields Ltd. and an ...

Court: Patna

as there was divergence of opinion given by two medical officers of the CCL with regard to the cause of the