Office - Judgment Search Results

Bfc Officers' Welfare Trust No. Vi Vs. Income-Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1997)63ITD169(Mum.)

further seen that the beneficiaries under the trust are the officers of certain category of the company. The objects of the

District Excise Officer, Vs. Income Tax Officer (ito V. Distt.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1998)66ITD168(Delhi)

the party in detail, he held that the District Excise Officer had failed to collect tax at source and to pay

District Excise Officer Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1998)61TTJ(Delhi)770

the party in detail, he held that the District Excise Officer had failed to collect tax at source and to pay

Chief Electoral Officer, Haryana Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh

Reported in: (1999)68ITD439(Chd.)

the communication dt. 24th May, 1994, from the Chief Electoral Officer, Haryana, to the managing director, HARTRON. Specific attention of the

District Excise Officer, Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

rise to the above controversy are not disputed.The District Excise Officer, Muzaffarnagar (hereinafter referred to as 'DEO') was required to furnish

District Excise Officer Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

even on merits in confirming the orders of the Income-tax Officer (TDS), Muzaffarnagar, for the financial years 1988-89, 1989-90, 1990-91, 1991-92,

Principal Officer, Somani Iron Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow

Reported in: (2003)86ITD750Luck

have been filed by the same assessee, namely, the Principal Officer, M/s Somani Iron & Steels Ltd., Kanpur, against a combined

Senior Accounts Officer (O and M), Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (2006)103TTJ(Delhi)584

price for erection and commissioning of opening of the site office. (iii) 75 per cent of the contract price for erection

Finance Officer, Maharishi Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (2008)113TTJ(Delhi)914

Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. (2000) 160 CTR (AP) 38 and Officers Association, Bhilai Steel Plant v. Union of India , respectively.

Project Officer, Sounda D. Colliery of Central Coal Fields Ltd. and an ...

Court: Patna

as there was divergence of opinion given by two medical officers of the CCL with regard to the cause of the