Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Offense - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial to open GPT-powered briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results — plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 01 2013

“whether the Offences Under Sections 353 186 and 332 of the Vs. Stat ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-01-2013

proceeding or complaint or F.I.R may be exercised where the offender and victim have settled their dispute would depend on the


Aug 17 2007

Tro Vs. Custodian Appointed Under the Special Court (Trial of Offences ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-17-2007

information received that any person has been involved in any offence relating to transactions in securities after the 1-4-1991 and on


Sep 17 2013

Ajoy Acharya Vs. State Bureau of Inv.Against Eco.Offence

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-17-2013

Acharya … Appellant Versus State Bureau of Inv. against Eco. OffenceRespondent With CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1455 OF 201.(Arising out of


Turn these results into brief-ready notes

Apr 01 2008

A.P. Mohammed Ali Vs. State Through the Central Bureau of Investigatio ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-01-2008

Reported in: 2008(2)CTC370

2007. Of course, this Court considered the gravity of the offence while dismissing the earlier petition seeking return of passport. The


Dec 05 2012

P. Venkatesan and Another Vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police Economic ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-05-2012

Reported in: 2013(2)MLJ(Crl)104; 2013(1)LW(Crl)470

file of the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore for the offence of buying the property from the main accused in C.C.


Mar 18 2013

M.P. Chaturvedi Vs. M.P. State Economic Offence Bureau, Bhopal

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-18-2013

Criminal Revision No.1856/2012 18.03.2013 Applicant by Shri Brijesh Singh, Advocate. Respondent by Shri Pankaj Dubey, Advocate. Present revision has been...


Mar 02 2013

“learned Counsel Inter-alia Contended That Although No Indicated Off ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-02-2013

CRM not M-5460 of 2013 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. not...


Jan 24 2013

“learned Counsel Contended That the Police Did Not Add Any New Offen ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-24-2013

dated 22.8.2012 (Annexure P1), on accusation of having committed an offence punishable under section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic


Dec 13 2012

“learned Counsel Inter-alia Contended That All the Offences Vs. Stat ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-13-2012

CRM not M-37739 of 2012 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. not...


Jul 11 2014

Ashoo Surendranath Tewari and Another Vs. The Deputy Superintendent of ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-11-2014

of 2011, wherein the petitioners are being prosecuted for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420 read with Section 120B of


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial