Offense - Judgment Search Results

“whether the Offences Under Sections 353 186 and 332 of the Vs. Stat ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

In what cases power to quash the criminal proceeding or complaint or F.I.R may be exercised where the offender and victim have settled their dispute would depend on the facts and circumstances of each CRM M-31765 o”6.

Tro Vs. Custodian Appointed Under the Special Court (Trial of Offences ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Act.(2) The Custodian may, on being satisfied on information received that any person has been involved in any offence relating to transactions in securities after the 1-4-1991 and on and before the 6-6-1992, notify the name of

Ajoy Acharya Vs. State Bureau of Inv.Against Eco.Offence

Court: Supreme Court of India

out of SLP (Crl.) No.61 of 2012) Ajoy Acharya … Appellant Versus State Bureau of Inv. against Eco. Offence … Respondent With CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1455 OF 201.(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.400 of 2012) JUDGMENT Jagdish Singh

Kumaran Muthu @ Muthukumaran Vs The State of Tamilnadu, rep by The Ins ...

Court: Chennai

Muthukumaran ... Petitioner/Accused No.8 Vs.1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep . by The Inspector of Police, Economic Offence Wing, Madurai and another. Crime No.1/2025 ... 1st Respondent / Complainant2. T.Sangeetha ... 2nd Respondent /De-facto Complainant 3.Ramanathan

Deepalakshmi Vs The State of Tamilnadu, rep by The Inspector of Police ...

Court: Chennai

MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Deepalakshmi ... Petitioner/Accused Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep By,The Inspector of Police, Economic Offence Wing, Dindigul District. (Crime No.2 of 2025) ... Respondent/ComplainantFor Petitioner : Mr.M.Balachander Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya

A.P. Mohammed Ali Vs. State Through the Central Bureau of Investigatio ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2008(2)CTC370

Court in Criminal Revision Case No. 574 of 2007. Of course, this Court considered the gravity of the offence while dismissing the earlier petition seeking return of passport. The court also observed that if the petitioner was

P. Venkatesan and Another Vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police Economic ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2013(2)MLJ(Crl)104; 2013(1)LW(Crl)470

in C.C. No. 29325 of 2004 on the file of the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore for the offence of buying the property from the main accused in C.C. No. 8 of 2000 thereby they have committed

M.P. Chaturvedi Vs. M.P. State Economic Offence Bureau, Bhopal

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Criminal Revision No.1856/2012 18.03.2013 Applicant by Shri Brijesh Singh, Advocate. Respondent by Shri Pankaj Dubey, Advocate. Present revision has been preferred against the order dated 22/08/2012 passed by the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) Shahdol...

“learned Counsel Inter-alia Contended That Although No Indicated Off ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

CRM not M-5460 of 2013 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. not M-5460 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision:-2.3.2013 Sahil Sachdeva & Anr. ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab...

“learned Counsel Contended That the Police Did Not Add Any New Offen ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

along with his other co-accused, vide FIR No.138 dated 22.8.2012 (Annexure P1), on accusation of having committed an offence punishable under section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 by the police of Police