Offender - Judgment Search Results
Defendant No.2 Is in Revision Under Article 227 of the Vs. Kewal Singh ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-13-2013
JASWANT SINGH Present:- Mr.J.S.Brar, Advocate for the Petitioner/defendant no.2. Mr.Surinder Garg, Advocate for respondents/plaintiff. *** JASWANT SINGH, J.(ORAL) Defendant no.2 is in revision under Article 227 of the Constitution assailing the order dated 12.10.2012 passed by the
“defendant No.1 Exparte Vide Order Dated Vs. Chamel Singh and Others ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-04-2014
opportunity for this purpose”.15.3.2014. “PW namely Kiran Kaur is present. Her cross examination could not be recorded as defendant requested adjournment. Today was the last opportunity to conclude its entire evidence by the plaintiffs. Since the defendant
Vs. India Steam Laundry(P) Ltd.Defendant/Re
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-22-2017
CALCUTTA ORIGINAL SIDE CASE No.CA/563 of 2013 PRASANTA KUMAR MITRA AND ORS. Plaintiff/Petitioner/Appeallant Versus INDIA STEAM LAUNDRY(P) LTD. Defendant/Respondent For Petitioner : For Respondent : Judgement Date :22. 03/2017 BEFORE : Hon'ble JUSTICE ARIJIT BANERJEE In the
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ram Chandra Prasad Defendant Vs Smt. Mina Devi Plaintiff
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-16-2011
1.The defendant has filed this first appeal against the judgment Sahoo, J. and decree dated 26.9.2006 passed by Sri Radheyshyam
O.Nagendran Defendant Vs. Arulmigu Meenakshi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-29-2011
1. The Appellant/Second Defendant has focused the present Second Appeal before this Court as against the Judgment and Decree dated 14.12.2005 in
…appellant/Defendant Vs. Duncan International (i) Limited
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-16-2012
2008. As facts and issues arising in all these suits are common, the appeals preferred by the appellant/original defendant and the cross objection filed by the respondent/original plaintiff are being disposed of by this common judgment and
M/S.Chainrup Sampatrampetitioner/ Plaintiff Vs. Punjab and Sind Bankre ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-04-2012
of 2000 , inter alia, claiming a declaration that the discharging of fixed deposit receipts issued by the defendant -bank in favour of the plaintiff was false, fraudulent, inoperative and invalid. The plaintiff has prayed for a
Govind Prasad Dalmiapetitioner/ Plaintiff Vs. West Bengal State Electr ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-09-2012
Mr. Sib Shankar Das, Adv. …for the plaintiff Mr. Sabyasachi Chowdhury, Adv. Mr. Sayantan Bose,Adv. … for the defendant Judgment on :9. h October, 2012. Asim Kumar Ray, J.This is a suit on obtaining leave under Clause
Vs. the Kolkata Municipal Corporation and ors. Defendant/Responden
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-16-2012
ORDER SHEET W.P.No.537 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE TAPAN KUMAR SHAH & ANR. Plaintiff/Petitioner/Applicant Versus THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.Defendant/Respondent For Plaintiff/Petitioner : MR.RUPAK GHOSH,ADVOCATE For KMC...
“6-c. Exclusion of Counter-claim.- Where a Defendant Vs. Punjab Nati ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-05-2013
alongwith principal payment in the suit. Rule 6-C reads as under :- “6-C. Exclusion of counter-claim.- Where a defendant sets up a counter-claim and the plaintiff contends that the claim thereby raised ought not to be disposed
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free