Offence Of - Judgment Search Results

“whether the Offences Under Sections 353 186 and 332 of the Vs. Stat ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

made by the learned Single Judge regarding quashing of the FIR on the basis of compromise for the offences against police officer under Sections 148, 149, 332, 353, 186 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. There

Tro Vs. Custodian Appointed Under the Special Court (Trial of Offences ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

These appeals have been filed by TRO, Central Range-1, under Section 10 of the Special Courts (Trial Of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Special Courts Act') against the order

Ajoy Acharya Vs. State Bureau of Inv.Against Eco.Offence

Court: Supreme Court of India

of office would be severed by removal from office. Therefore, when a public servant is accused of an offence of taking gratification other than legal remuneration for doing or forbearing to do an official act (Section 161 IPC) … of office would be severed by removal from office. Therefore, when a public servant is accused of an offence of taking gratification other than legal remuneration for doing or forbearing to do an official act (Section 161 IPC)

A.P. Mohammed Ali Vs. State Through the Central Bureau of Investigatio ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2008(2)CTC370

undergo a travel to United States of America. 2. The petitioner, along with ten others, stands charged with offences punishable under Sections 120B read with 420, 467, 468, 471, 475, 201, 218, 255, 258 and 259 of

P. Venkatesan and Another Vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police Economic ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2013(2)MLJ(Crl)104; 2013(1)LW(Crl)470

in C.C. No. 29325 of 2004 on the file of the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore for the offence of buying the property from the main accused in C.C. No. 8 of 2000 thereby they have committed the

M.P. Chaturvedi Vs. M.P. State Economic Offence Bureau, Bhopal

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Matched in: Parties M.P. Chaturvedi Vs. M.P. State Economic Offence Bureau, Bhopal

“learned Counsel Inter-alia Contended That Although No Indicated Off ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

against them along with their other co-accused, vide FIR No.02 dated 1.1.2013, on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under sections 148, 323, 341, 382 and 506 read with section 149 IPC by the police of

“learned Counsel Contended That the Police Did Not Add Any New Offen ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

along with his other co-accused, vide FIR No.138 dated 22.8.2012 (Annexure P1), on accusation of having committed an offence punishable under section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 by the police of Police

“learned Counsel Inter-alia Contended That All the Offences Vs. Stat ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

bail, in a case registered against him, vide FIR No.106 dated 12.8.2011 on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under section 279, 337 and 427 IPC by the police of Police Station Division No.7, Ludhiana, invoking

Ashoo Surendranath Tewari and Another Vs. The Deputy Superintendent of ...

Court: Mumbai

to non-application of mind in granting sanction had become academic. The Hon'ble Apex Court had held that the offence of cheating under Section 420 or for that matter offence under Section 467, 468, 471 and 120B of Indian … both the ingredients of Section 420 need to be established. 28. To hold a person guilty of the offence of cheating, it has to be shown that his intention was dishonest at the time of making the promise.