Offence - Judgment Search Results
“whether the Offences Under Sections 353 186 and 332 of the Vs. Stat ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-01-2013
made by the learned Single Judge regarding quashing of the FIR on the basis of compromise for the offences against police officer under Sections 148, 149, 332, 353, 186 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. There
Tro Vs. Custodian Appointed Under the Special Court (Trial of Offences ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-17-2007
These appeals have been filed by TRO, Central Range-1, under Section 10 of the Special Courts (Trial Of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Special Courts Act') against the order
Ajoy Acharya Vs. State Bureau of Inv.Against Eco.Offence
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
out of SLP (Crl.) No.61 of 2012) Ajoy Acharya … Appellant Versus State Bureau of Inv. against Eco. Offence … Respondent With CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1455 OF 201.(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.400 of 2012) JUDGMENT Jagdish Singh
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kumaran Muthu @ Muthukumaran Vs The State of Tamilnadu, rep by The Ins ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
Muthukumaran ... Petitioner/Accused No.8 Vs.1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep . by The Inspector of Police, Economic Offence Wing, Madurai and another. Crime No.1/2025 ... 1st Respondent / Complainant2. T.Sangeetha ... 2nd Respondent /De-facto Complainant 3.Ramanathan
Deepalakshmi Vs The State of Tamilnadu, rep by The Inspector of Police ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-17-2026
MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Deepalakshmi ... Petitioner/Accused Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep By,The Inspector of Police, Economic Offence Wing, Dindigul District. (Crime No.2 of 2025) ... Respondent/ComplainantFor Petitioner : Mr.M.Balachander Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya
A.P. Mohammed Ali Vs. State Through the Central Bureau of Investigatio ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2008
Reported in: 2008(2)CTC370
undergo a travel to United States of America. 2. The petitioner, along with ten others, stands charged with offences punishable under Sections 120B read with 420, 467, 468, 471, 475, 201, 218, 255, 258 and 259 of
P. Venkatesan and Another Vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police Economic ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-05-2012
Reported in: 2013(2)MLJ(Crl)104; 2013(1)LW(Crl)470
in C.C. No. 29325 of 2004 on the file of the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore for the offence of buying the property from the main accused in C.C. No. 8 of 2000 thereby they have committed
M.P. Chaturvedi Vs. M.P. State Economic Offence Bureau, Bhopal
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-18-2013
Matched in: Parties M.P. Chaturvedi Vs. M.P. State Economic Offence Bureau, Bhopal
“learned Counsel Inter-alia Contended That Although No Indicated Off ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-02-2013
against them along with their other co-accused, vide FIR No.02 dated 1.1.2013, on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under sections 148, 323, 341, 382 and 506 read with section 149 IPC by the police of
“learned Counsel Contended That the Police Did Not Add Any New Offen ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
along with his other co-accused, vide FIR No.138 dated 22.8.2012 (Annexure P1), on accusation of having committed an offence punishable under section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 by the police of Police
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free