Occurrence - Judgment Search Results
i) the Occurrence in This Case Is of 10.1.2001 and He Has Already Face ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-16-2013
right leg. He raised noise “Mar Ditta Mar Ditta”.. Then all the accused decamped from the place of occurrence with their respective weapons in the same car. While going, Rakesh Kumar was stated to have proclaimed that
i) What Cannot Possibly Be Disputed Here Is That the Occurrence in Thi ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
on his back as well. All the injured raised alarm. Thereafter, the appellants decamped from the place of occurrence with their respective weapons. The injured were removed to the hospital, where they were medico legally examined. In
“learned Counsel Inter-alia Contended That the Present Occurrence Vs ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-30-2012
hearing, the following order was passed by this Court on 19.11.2012:- “Learned counsel, inter-alia, contended that the present occurrence has taken place inside the house of the petitioner and the complainant party having trespassed into his house
18-section briefs on any result in this list
i) What Cannot Possibly Be Disputed Here Is That the Occurrence in Vs. ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-09-2012
Sukhdev Singh, who rescued them. Thereafter, the accused-convicts were stated to have fled away from the place of occurrence with their respective weapons.2. Leveling a variety of allegations and narrating the sequence of events in detail, in
“counsel Would Contend That the Occurrence as Vs. State of Punjab -- ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-27-2014
while issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court:- “Counsel would contend that the occurrence as per complainant with regard to having suffered datar blow on the leg as also snatching of PuRs.containing
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free