Occupying - Judgment Search Results
Occupier/Director, Hindustan Lever Ltd. and Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-31-2008
Reported in: [2008(116)FLR1152]
D.P. Singh, J.1. Heard Sri Sudhir Chandra, learned Senior Advocate 'assisted by Sri Vivek Chaudhary for the petitioner, Sri Shyam Narain and Sri A.P. Srivastava for the contesting respondents and the learned Standing Counsel for the...
K. Ramachandran (Occupier), Ravendra Mills Limited and anr. Vs. Employ ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-13-1973
Reported in: (1974)2MLJ78
the respondent Raman was employed in the administrative office of J.K. Chemicals Limited. J.K. Chemicals Limited were the occupiers of a factory called Eastern Chemical Company. They were situated in the same compound. In the building of
Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality and Another Vs. Various Occupiers ...
Court: South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal
Decided on: Nov-26-2013
protests followed. Eventually on 9 October 2008 and following a mass meeting, the residents of Eden Park began occupying the unoccupied and incomplete houses in Ext 5. Ms Booysen summarises what motivated their conduct thus: 'Despite all
18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Inspector of Factories Vs. S.N. Kanchal, Occupier, L. Texmaco Limi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-05-2004
Reported in: 2005(2)ALD(Cri)747; [2005(106)FLR853]; (2005)IIILLJ846AP
of Factories, Cuddapah inspected the Texmaco Limited (Cement Division), Yerraguntla and it is stated that respondent-accused was the occupier and on inspection they found that respondent-accused allowed the un-trained and in-experienced contract workers Chereddy Venkata Subbareddy, Sreenivasulu
Dcm Shriram Industries Ltd., Unit Daurala Sugar Works , Through Its Oc ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-23-2005
Reported in: 2005(3)AWC2513
for providing reserved area or assigned area to a sugar factory and it is for this purpose the occupiers of sugar factories are required under Rule 21 of the 1954 Rules to indicate to the Cane Commissioner
Triveni Engineering and Industries Limited Through Its Occupier Dr. M. ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-11-2005
Reported in: 2006(1)AWC736
facilities to be provided to the officer appointed in pursuance of Clause (b) by the persons owning or occupying land in the area; and(e) such incidental and consequential matters as may appear to be necessary or desirable
Govind Nagar Sugar Limited Through Its Occupier K.M. Dubey Vs. State o ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jun-08-2005
Reported in: 2005(4)AWC3322
Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Ms Bharati Sapru Advocate on behalf of the petitioner, Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 2, Sri Neeraj Sharma Advocate on behalf of respondent No. 3 and Sri Amit...
Venus Sugar Limited a Company Registered Under the Companies Act, 1956 ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-24-2006
Reported in: 2006(3)AWC3112
issue. There should be test of bonafide about making payment by the petitioners. Such bonafide test will be occupied by the condition to be imposed by the Court. Normally we accept a principle of payment 50% of
Poddar Point Owners and Occupiers Assn. and ors. Vs. Anandilal Poddar ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-18-2014
CS842of 1989 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE PODDAR POINT OWNERS & OCCUPIERS ASSN. & ORS.Versus ANANDILAL PODDAR & SONS. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE BISWANATH SOMADDER Date : 18th February, 2014.
V. Anandan and Others Vs. The Superintending Engineer (Occupier), Tami ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-02-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order of this Court, dated 14.12.2012 made in W.P.No.5679 of 2011.) Common Judgment P. Kalaiyarasan, J. 1. These instant writ appeals arise from the...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free