Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Occupying - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 31 2008

Occupier/Director, Hindustan Lever Ltd. and Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jan-31-2008

Reported in: [2008(116)FLR1152]

D.P. Singh, J.1. Heard Sri Sudhir Chandra, learned Senior Advocate 'assisted by Sri Vivek Chaudhary for the petitioner, Sri Shyam Narain and Sri A.P. Srivastava for the contesting respondents and the learned Standing Counsel for the...


Aug 13 1973

K. Ramachandran (Occupier), Ravendra Mills Limited and anr. Vs. Employ ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-13-1973

Reported in: (1974)2MLJ78

the respondent Raman was employed in the administrative office of J.K. Chemicals Limited. J.K. Chemicals Limited were the occupiers of a factory called Eastern Chemical Company. They were situated in the same compound. In the building of


Nov 26 2013

Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality and Another Vs. Various Occupiers ...

Court: South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal

Decided on: Nov-26-2013

protests followed. Eventually on 9 October 2008 and following a mass meeting, the residents of Eden Park began occupying the unoccupied and incomplete houses in Ext 5. Ms Booysen summarises what motivated their conduct thus: 'Despite all


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 05 2004

The Inspector of Factories Vs. S.N. Kanchal, Occupier, L. Texmaco Limi ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-05-2004

Reported in: 2005(2)ALD(Cri)747; [2005(106)FLR853]; (2005)IIILLJ846AP

of Factories, Cuddapah inspected the Texmaco Limited (Cement Division), Yerraguntla and it is stated that respondent-accused was the occupier and on inspection they found that respondent-accused allowed the un-trained and in-experienced contract workers Chereddy Venkata Subbareddy, Sreenivasulu


Mar 23 2005

Dcm Shriram Industries Ltd., Unit Daurala Sugar Works , Through Its Oc ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Mar-23-2005

Reported in: 2005(3)AWC2513

for providing reserved area or assigned area to a sugar factory and it is for this purpose the occupiers of sugar factories are required under Rule 21 of the 1954 Rules to indicate to the Cane Commissioner


May 11 2005

Triveni Engineering and Industries Limited Through Its Occupier Dr. M. ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: May-11-2005

Reported in: 2006(1)AWC736

facilities to be provided to the officer appointed in pursuance of Clause (b) by the persons owning or occupying land in the area; and(e) such incidental and consequential matters as may appear to be necessary or desirable


Jun 08 2005

Govind Nagar Sugar Limited Through Its Occupier K.M. Dubey Vs. State o ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jun-08-2005

Reported in: 2005(4)AWC3322

Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Ms Bharati Sapru Advocate on behalf of the petitioner, Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 2, Sri Neeraj Sharma Advocate on behalf of respondent No. 3 and Sri Amit...


May 24 2006

Venus Sugar Limited a Company Registered Under the Companies Act, 1956 ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: May-24-2006

Reported in: 2006(3)AWC3112

issue. There should be test of bonafide about making payment by the petitioners. Such bonafide test will be occupied by the condition to be imposed by the Court. Normally we accept a principle of payment 50% of


Feb 18 2014

Poddar Point Owners and Occupiers Assn. and ors. Vs. Anandilal Poddar ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-18-2014

CS842of 1989 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE PODDAR POINT OWNERS & OCCUPIERS ASSN. & ORS.Versus ANANDILAL PODDAR & SONS. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE BISWANATH SOMADDER Date : 18th February, 2014.


Aug 02 2016

V. Anandan and Others Vs. The Superintending Engineer (Occupier), Tami ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-02-2016

(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order of this Court, dated 14.12.2012 made in W.P.No.5679 of 2011.) Common Judgment P. Kalaiyarasan, J. 1. These instant writ appeals arise from the...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial