Nursing Home - Judgment Search Results
Chandigarh Nursing Home Vs. Sukhdeep Kaur
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-09-2022
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5931 OF2022Chandigarh Nursing Home and Anr. …Appellant(s) Versus Sukhdeep Kaur …Respondent(s) JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned
Deep Nursing Home and Another versus Manmeet Singh Mattewal and Others
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-09-2025
Reported in: [2025]10S.C.R.26
[2025] 10 S.C.R. 26 : 2025 INSC 1094 Deep Nursing Home and Another v. Manmeet Singh Mattewal and Others (Civil Appeal No. 4296 of 2025) 09 September 2025 [Sanjay … a wife-C and newborn child of respondent no.1 - Allegation of medical negligence - The SCDRC found appellant no.1-Nursing home and appellant no.2-doctor medically negligent on the ground that they did not exercise due care and caution in
Private Hospital & Nursing Homes Association Vs. The Secretary
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-13-2020
N.B.PATIL HOSPITAL, MULANDNAKA GADAG58210 NOW REP. BY ITS: MANAGING PARTNER MR.PAVANKUMAR N. PATIL - 3 - 8. NAREGAL NURSING HOME NO23 SRI SIDDHARUDH-SWAMIMATH OLD HUBLI-24 NOW REP. BY ITS: PROPRIETOR DR. SHARATCHANDRA GOVIND NAREGAL9 DR. BIJAPUR HOSPITAL DR. … KAMBLI ROAD - 4 - HUBLI - 580020 REP BY ITS: MANAGING DIRECTOR DR.ANIL KUMAR MAHANTAPPA BEMBALGI15 TAVARGERI NURSING HOME PVT LTD TAVARGERI NURSING HOME PVT LTD, REGD OFFICE: NEAR K.C.PARK POST OFFICE DHARWAD NOW REP BY ITS:
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dr. Menons Nursing Home vs the Central Board of Trustees
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-02-2022
THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 11TH KARTHIKA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 16572 OF 2020 PETITIONER: DR. MENONS NURSING HOME, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETRIX DR.NAYANTHARA, OLAVAKKODE, PALAKKAD-678 002. BY ADVS. V.N.HARIDAS SMT.SIBY.P.JOSE SRI.K.T.BOSCO RESPONDENTS:1 THE CENTRAL BOARD OF … fifty five thousand one hundred and thirty three only).2. Petitioner is carrying on the business activity of a nursing home at Palakkad and had employedemployees for running the same. On the basis of the inspection, proceedings under Section
Shree Devi Nursing Home vs State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-28-2024
BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.1412 OF 2024 (GM - RES) BETWEEN: SHREE DEVI NURSING HOME AT NO.1, 2, 3 RCES COLONY BHOGADI 2ND STAGE MYSURU - 570 026. REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER DR.DEVARAJ … THAT THERE IS NO AUTHORITY IN LAW TO THE RESPONDENTS TO LOCK DOWN THE PREMISES OF THE PETITIONER NURSING HOME AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR ORDERS ON 12.02.2024, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT
Anand Nursing Home Vs. Mahadev Gaikwad
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-24-2008
Reported in: [2008(119)FLR907]; (2009)IILLJ580Bom
Matched in: Parties Anand Nursing Home Vs. Mahadev Gaikwad
U.P. Nursing Home Association and ors. Vs. Rajesh Kumar Srivastava and ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-06-2004
Reported in: (2004)2UPLBEC1404
Matched in: Parties U.P. Nursing Home Association and ors. Vs. Rajesh Kumar Srivastava and ors.
Geetanjali Nursing Home (P) Ltd. Vs. Dr. Dileep Makhija and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2003
Reported in: AIR2004Delhi53; [2005]127CompCas659(Delhi); (2004)1CompLJ457(Del); 107(2003)DLT180; [2003]48SCL524(Delhi)
of hospital and from carrying on any personal and/or professional work from the hospital premises. 2. Plaintiff Geetanjali Nursing Home (P) Ltd. duly incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office 3, MMTC/STC Colony, Geetanjali Enclave, … Directors of the company. The company was incorporated with the main object of running and maintaining hospital and nursing home. The said company purchased plot No.3, STC/ MMTC Colony, New Delhi in auction from President of India vide
Uma Nursing Home Rep. by Its Owner Dr. Neelambal and Dr. Neelambal Vs. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-17-2005
Reported in: (2005)1MLJ426
third opposite party Dr. Ravichandran was set ex parte for his non-appearance and the petitioner herself and the Nursing Home are the parties required to defend the case of the complainants. The complainants have levelled false allegations and … have levelled false allegations and averments in order to make a tall claim against the petitioner and the Nursing Home, without any basis or proof and there was no medical negligence on the part of the petitioner or
Shri Vivekanand Nursing Home Trust and Others Vs. Union of India, Thro ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Oct-04-2012
Matched in: Parties Shri Vivekanand Nursing Home Trust and Others Vs. Union of India, Through Its Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India and Others
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free