Numeric - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: numeric Year: 2011 Page 1 of about 254 results (0.014 seconds)Sykes Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-09-2011
sykes v united states syllabus october term 2010 sykes v united states supreme court of the united states sykes v...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTvs Berg Limited Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-13-2011
the above tax case appeals have been filed under section 260a of the income tax act 1961 by the assessee...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRohit Shekhar Vs. Shri Narayan Dutt Tiwari and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2011
1 the present application displays a blatant refusal by a party to the litigation to comply with the court direction...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCarlsberg India Pvt. Ltd Vs. Radico Khaitan Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2011
..... referred to and distinguished a few judgments pertaining to a numeral being an essential feature of a registered trademark the discussion ..... in india has fought shy of according trademark status to single numerals or letters while a combination of letters and numbers has ..... court of first instance in rejecting a trademark for the numerals 100 and 300 in respect of printed matter manipulative puzzles .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd., Rep. by Its Power of Attorney Holder ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-24-2011
Reported in: 2011(2)KLJ613; 2011(2)ILR(Ker)804; 2011(2)KLT1040; 2011CrLJ3791; 2011(2)KHC582
..... to that value expressed in terms of standard units of weight measure or numeration as the case may be converted at the rates specified in the ..... to that value expressed in terms of standard units of weight measure or numeration as the case may be converted at the rates specified in the ..... measure as the case may be 2 the units of numeration specified by or under section 13 shall be the standard units of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS K Sachdeva and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2011
..... professional knowledge 50 75 composite 2 hours 120ii english language 50 minutes iii reasoning amp numerical 25 50ability only qualifying all these three tests will be given in a composite booklet ..... letter dated 14th november 2002 the ail enclosed another information handout incorporating model questions on numerical ability for those who applied pursuant to the staff notice dated 2nd may 2003 a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWal-mart Stores, Inc. Vs. Dukes
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-20-2011
..... seeking certification must demonstrate first that 1 the class is so numerous that joinder of all mem bers is impracticable 2 there ..... must be prepared to prove that there are in fact sufficiently numerous parties common questions of law or fact etc we recognized ..... threshold requirements for class action certification 1 the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable 3 the claims .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMs. Christopher Housing Developers Pvt. Ltd Vs. Smt. Manjit Poddar, an ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-30-2011
..... in favour of the plaintiff which extends benefit to all such numerous persons the learned court below noticed that there was no specific ..... gave permission to the plaintiff to represent on behalf of other numerous persons rdquo 26 it appears that in coming to such conclusion ..... code of civil procedure provides inter alia that where there are numerous persons having the same interest in one suit one or .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTStorer Duraisamy Yogendra and Another Vs. Velupillai Tharmaratnam Samp ...
Court: Sri Lanka Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-06-2011
..... strenuously urged that this appeal be referred for consideration by a bench which would be numerically superior to the bench that made the rajendran chettiar decision as otherwise irreparable prejudice ..... this matter placed before the hon chief justice to consider referring the matter to a numerically superior bench for further consideration the two substantive questions on which leave to appeal .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVijay Kumar Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi Through the Chief Secretary, New ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2011
..... malafide against the officers of the respondent board who scrutinized his hand writing signatures and numerical figures and prima facie came to the conclusion that there was mismatch we are conscious ..... of the fact that the respondent board has the onerous responsibility of conducting numerous tests and ensuring safe guards against impersonation and cheating it would be too much to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial