Numeric - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: numeric Year: 1927 Page 1 of about 89 results (0.011 seconds)Bowers Vs. New York and Albany Lighterage Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-21-1927
bowers v new york albany lighterage co 273 u s 346 1927 u s supreme court bowers v new york...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBarrett Co. Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-21-1927
barrett co v united states 273 u s 227 1927 u s supreme court barrett co v united states 273...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSonachalam Pillai and ors. Vs. Kumaravelu Chettiar and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-16-1927
Reported in: (1928)54MLJ8
..... is that section 30 is applicable only to cases where there arc numerous parties who cannot all be conveniently brought before the court but ..... 30 in cases in which the members of the tarwad were numerous would at all events apply which while authorising one of the ..... ramachandra aiyar on the ground that the parties there were not numerous and section 30 could not in strictness be applied he also .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHatimbhai Hassanally Vs. Framroz Eduljee Dinshaw
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-31-1927
Reported in: AIR1927Bom278; (1927)29BOMLR498
..... the able arguments addressed to us by counsel and to the numerous authorities that have been cited to us on this and other ..... by sir norman macleod and he deals in detail with the numerous authorities on the point but apart from the authorities the reasoning ..... i deprecate having first to construe the code of 1859 with its numerous clauses and then to apply that construction to an entirely different .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAbdul Ghani Sahib and ors. Vs. N.P.R.M.V.R.M. Subramania Chettiar and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-10-1927
Reported in: AIR1929Mad44
..... that 100 is not a sufficient number to justify the appellation numerous within the meaning of this rule i am not able to ..... that where the number of defendants was thirty it was considered as numerous within the meaning of the corresponding english rule order 16 rule ..... he cannot say that the number of villagers concerned is numerous within the meaning of order 1 rule 8 what particular number .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFarrington Vs. Tokushige
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-21-1927
..... the hawaiian foreign language school law and regulations the plaintiffs were members of numerous voluntary associations conducting foreign language schools for instruction of japanese children page ..... in the chinese and the remainder in the japanese respondents are members of numerous voluntary unincorporated associations conducting foreign language schools for instruction of japanese children these .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Chingleput Municipal Council Represented by Its Chairman and anr. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-11-1927
Reported in: 103Ind.Cas.883
..... route instead of being at the beck and call of any one of the numerous or all the numerous hirers makes no difference whatever this appeal must be allowed and the plaintiffs .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBaker (inspector of Taxes) Vs. Archer-shee
Court: House of Lords
Decided on: Jul-20-1927
..... in no way different then and it would have been in no way different however numerous were the persons entitled to share the income between them it would however be difficult ..... to suggest if the body of life beneficiaries were numerous that there could be any normal right in any or all of them together other .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTyson and Bro. Vs. Banton
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-28-1927
..... and the law of averages to step in as the controlling factor and holds the numerous amounts so collected as a general fund to be paid out to those who shall ..... preventing the maintenance of pool parlors murphy v california 225 u s 623 or in numerous other cases in which the exercise of private rights has been restrained in the public .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMissouri ex Rel. Wabash Ry. Co. Vs. Public Serv. Comm'n
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-10-1927
..... in the district each party makes claim for its plan the advantages of safety economy numerous mechanical and engineering conveniences and the avoidance of certain mechanical and engineering hazards all or ..... proving that the order of the commission is arbitrary and unreasonable plaintiffs in error criticize numerous engineering features of the city s plan especially the provision for an 18 foot .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial