Numeric - Judgment Search Results

K.V. Amarnath and Another Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1998KAR730; 1998(5)KarLJ62

order1 alleging corruption favouritism nepotism and mala fides against respondents 3 and 4 the petitioner herein has prayed for the...

Chitralekha Shibu Kunju Vs. Shri Shibu Kunju

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1998(1)BomCR710; II(1998)DMC454

ordert k chandrashekhara das j 1 petition for restitution of conjugal rights filed by wife was dismissed by the family...

J. Samuel Vs. S. Mathisa Pandian and 2 Others

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1998(1)CTC296; (1998)IIMLJ742

order1 the revision petition has been filed against the order of the learned additional sub judge tirunelveli in i a...

M/S. Serai Kella Glass Works Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1997SC1948; 1997(91)ELT497(SC); JT1997(4)SC535; 1997(3)SCALE454; (1997)4SCC641; [1997]3SCR700

..... president of america in 1841 the practice of appointing political followers had reached its pinnacle numerous persons hired through the spoils system were untrained for their work and indifferent to it .....

Arora Enterprises Ltd., and Others Vs. Indubhushan Obhan and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1997SC1275; 1997(3)ALLMR(SC)381; JT1997(3)SC427; 1997(2)SCALE693; (1997)5SCC366; [1997]2SCR857; 1997(1)LC796(SC)

..... coming up before the courts not only being offences under the penal code but under numerous acts if the right of revision was to be barred the provision containing the bar .....

Meghalaya Plywoods Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Guwahati

..... of rs 5 lacs only but did not show cause and after taking time on numerous occasions ultimately filed a civil suit being title suit no 10 h of 1988 in .....

Meghalaya Plywoods Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Guwahati

..... of rs 5 lacs only but did not show cause and after taking time on numerous occasions ultimately filed a civil suit being title suit no 10 h of 1988 in .....

Air Commodore I.J.S. Boparai, Vm Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1998(44)DRJ1b

..... promotion by the promotion board even though he had the high numerical gradings which were given to him despite the adverse comments ..... as far as the appellant is concerned he had superior numerical gradings which entitled him to be considered for promotion from ..... has asserted in his letters patent appeal that he has obtained numerous awards for professional competence and high achievement as far as .....

Amchem Products, Inc. Vs. Windsor

Court: US Supreme Court

..... defendants promised to pay more than 200 million to gain release of the claims of numerous inventory plaintiffs after settling the inventory claims ccr together with the plaintiffs lawyers ccr ..... from the class if they so chose within a threemonth opt out period objectors raised numerous challenges to the settlement they urged that the settlement unfairly disadvantaged those without currently .....

Abrams Vs. Johnson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... court noted split 12 of the district s 35 counties 28 of its precincts and numerous cities linda meggers director of reapportionment services for the georgia general assembly was qualified ..... plan contained two majority black districts and split two counties outside the atlanta area and numerous precincts the plaintiffs objected to the submission the district court mentioned the illustrative plan in .....