Noting - Judgment Search Results

Currency Note Press Vs. n.n.sardesai .

Court: Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5152 OF2017Currency Note Press & Anr. .. Appellant(s) Versus N.N. Sardesai & Ors. .. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. This

Noted Infotech P. Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: IV(2008)BC292(SC); (2008)3CompLJ440(SC); 2008(11)SCALE168; (2008)8SCC431; [2008]86SCL207(SC); 2008(8)SCC431; 2008(11)SCALE168

ORDERC.A. No. 4649 of 2006 -1. Having heard the learned Counsel for the parties and after going through the averments made in the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal before the Securities Appellate...

“further as Noted by the Commissioner the Civil Court Also Held Vs. ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

orders before the Financial Commissioner. The said authority, however, dismissed the revision petition observing as follows:- “Further as noted by the Commissioner, the civil court also held that the possession of the plaintiff (present petitioneRs.over the suit

Noted Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Adjudicating and Enquiry Officer, Sec ...

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Justice N.K. Sodhi, Presiding Officer(Oral) The impugned order levying a monetary penalty of rupees one crore on the appellant under section 15 A(a) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 for not complying...

Continental Bank Note Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Continental Bank Note Co. v. United States - 154 U.S. 671 (1882) U.S. Supreme Court Continental Bank Note Co. v. United

The Confederate Note Case

Court: US Supreme Court

The Confederate Note Case - 86 U.S. 548 (1873) U.S. Supreme Court The Confederate Note Case, 86 U.S. 19 Wall. 548

India Security Press Mazdoor Sangh Vs. Currency Note Press and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1993)IIILLJ58Bom

hours of work is illegal.2. The Petitioners are a trade union representing the workmen in the 1st Respondent-Currency Note Press, and the 2nd Respondent-India Security Press. The Respondents-Presses on 10th Jan. and 29th Jan. 1983, respectively, gave

Sri. Rajaram M Shetty vs Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran (P) Ltd,

Court: Karnataka

S/O M RAMANA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS EMPLOYEE NO.20177, WORKING AS ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, BHARTIYA RESERVE BANK NOTE MUDRAN(P) LIMITED MYSORE-570003, RESIDING AT E-15, BRBNMPL TOWNSHIP, NOTE MUDRAN NAGAR MYSORE-570003. Digitally signed byREKHA R NOW RESIDING

U Bhuvaneshvari vs Bharathiya Reserve Bank Note Mudrana P Ltd

Court: Karnataka

2026 (S-TR) BETWEEN: U BHUVANESHVARI W/O RAVEENDRA P BHAT AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS EMPLOYEE NO.20488 BHARATHIYA RESERVE BANK NOTE MUDRAN (P) LTD. AT C-13, NOTE MUDRAN NAGAR MYSORE-570003 …PETITIONER (BY SRI KARUNAKARA P, ADVOCATE) AND:1. BHARATHIYA RESERVE

Sri Rajaram M Shetty vs Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran (P) Limited

Court: Karnataka

S/O M RAMANNA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, EMPLOYEE NO.20177 WORKING AS ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, BHARTIYA RESERVE BANK NOTE MUDRAN (P) LIMITED, NOTE MUDRAN NAGAR, MYSURU-570003 R/AT PRESENTLY E-15, BRBNMPL TOWNSHIP, NOTE MUDRAN NAGAR MYSURU-570003Digitally …PETITIONER signed