Noticeable - Judgment Search Results
Notice of Motion to Respondent Nos.1 to 5 Only at Vs. Balwinder Singh ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-08-2013
the Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 5 only at this stage. Ms.Munisha Gandhi, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts
“notice to Respondent No.6 Could Not Vs. Kulwant Rai ....Petitioner
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-16-2013
IOIN CR No.6450 of 1999 (O&M) - 1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH IOIN CR No.6450 of 1999 (O&M) Date of Decision:16. 01.2013 Kulwant Rai ....Petitioner Versus Gulab Kaur and others...
Notice of Motion. Vs. Om Parkash (Sc) Lambardar and Another .....Petit ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
the Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.N.K.Verma, Senior DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Let four copies of the
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Notice of Motion to Respondent Nos.1 to 5 Only at Vs. Hira Singh and A ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
the Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 5 only at this stage. Let five copies of the writ petition
Notice of Motion to Respondent Nos.1 to 5 Only at Vs. Sahib Singh and ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-04-2013
the Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 5 only at this stage. Mr.Manot Bajaj, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts
Was Noticed by the Trial Court. the List of the Stolen Property on Beh ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-05-2013
in a better position to identify the accused but he totally denied their identity. It was also further noticed that the allegations were that injuries had been inflicted with the help of a knife which was in
“notice of Motion for 15.2.2012 on the Limited Ground as to Why the ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-11-2013
schemes framed under the Employees Provident Fund Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 as no discernible or cogent reasons are noticed therein to support the conclusion reached. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case or entering
Notice of Motion to Respondent Nos.1 to 5 Only at Vs. Gurmej Singh and ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-18-2013
the Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 5 only at this stage. Ms.Munisha Gandhi, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab,
Notice of Motion. Vs. Dushyant and Others .....Petitioners
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-11-2013
the Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.R.D.Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Let five copies
Respondents Gave Notice to the Petitioner Directing It to Close Down V ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-14-2013
was referred to the Arbitrator and it was settled. It is further stated that on 22.10.2011, respondents gave notice to the petitioner directing it to close down Vajra Arbitration Case No.92 of 2012(O&M) 3 Cable Network in
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free